The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Decomposition of plant material in Australian soils. III. Residual organic and microbial biomass C and N from isotope-labelled legume material and soil organic matter, decomposing under field conditions
Abstract
After eight years decomposition of 14C, 15N-labelled legume (Medicago littoralis) material previously mixed into topsoils (0-10 cm) at four field sites in South Australia, residual organic 14C and 15N to 30 cm depth accounted for respectively 11-13% of input 14C, and 31-38% of input 15N. About 90% of the residual organic 14C and 70-80% of the residual l15N was recovered in topsoils. For sites in similar rainfall areas, soils of heavier texture retained slightly greater amounts of 14C and15N-labelled residues. Throughout the eight-year experimental period, the rates of decline of residual organic 14C and 15N exceeded those of native soil organic C and N. A comparison of the decline of organic 14C in topsoils, averaged for the four South Australian sites, with the average decline reported for 14C-labelled plant residues in soils at English and Nigerian field sites, suggests that net decomposition rates doubled approximately for an 8-9°C rise in mean annual air temperatures. Microbial biomass 14C and 15N of topsoils with time accounted for decreasing proportions of total biomass C and N, and of residual organic I4C and I5N. The relatively greater retention after eight years of biomass 14C and 15N in soils of heavier texture is consistent with the concept that the net decay of C and N in soils is dependent upon the turnover of biomass C and N, and that decay rates are decreased in soils which have the greater capacity to protect decomposer populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils
Six, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A., & Paustian, K. (2002) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1016125726789 · Cited by 4,633
Stabilization and destabilization of soil organic matter: mechanisms and controls
Sollins, P., Homann, P., & Caldwell, B. A. (1996) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(96)00036-5 · Cited by 1,578
Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration
Ramachandran Nair, P. K., Mohan Kumar, B., & Nair, V. D. (2009) · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science · doi:10.1002/jpln.200800030 · Cited by 1,157
Change in soil carbon following afforestation
Paul, K. I., Polglase, P. J., Nyakuengama, J. G., & Khanna, P. K. (2002) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00740-x · Cited by 1,091
The role of biology in the formation, stabilization and degradation of soil structure
Oades, J. M. (1993) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/0016-7061(93)90123-3 · Cited by 710
Metadata
- Authors
- Ladd, J., Amato, M., & Oades, J.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Soil Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1985-12-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 603-611
- ISSN
- 0004-9573 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-568X
- OpenAlex
- W2044996111
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decomposition of plant material in Australian soils. III. Residual organic and microbial biomass C and N from isotope-labelled legume material and soil organic matter, decomposing under field conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/sr9850603
- The paper
- Ladd, J., Amato, M., & Oades, J. (1985). Decomposition of plant material in Australian soils. III. Residual organic and microbial biomass C and N from isotope-labelled legume material and soil organic matter, decomposing under field conditions. Australian Journal of Soil Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/sr9850603
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.