Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 810

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Study of free and occluded particulate organic matter in soils by solid state 13C Cp/MAS NMR spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy

Golchin, A, Oades, JM, Skjemstad, JO, Clarke, P·1994·Australian Journal of Soil Research

Abstract

A simple densimetric method for the separation of free and occluded particulate organic materials was developed and applied to five virgin soils. The free organic matter was isolated by suspending the soil in sodium polytungstate solution (d = 1.6 Mg m-3) and decanting the light material. The remaining soil was disaggregated by sonification for liberation of occluded organic materials. The free light fraction consisted of large, undecomposed or partly decomposed root and plant fragments. This fraction comprised 0.59-4.34% of soil dry weight and accounted for 6.9-31.3% and 5.9-22.1% of total soil carbon and nitrogen respectively. Identifiable components of the occluded fraction were small particles of incompletely decomposed organic residues, pollen grains, particles of plant tissue such as lignin coils and phytoliths. This fraction comprised 0.69-1.81% of soil dry weight and represented 9.2-17.5% and 6.2-14.1% of the total soil carbon and nitrogen. The proportion of soil organic carbon recovered as the occluded fraction was high in soils with high clay contents. The chemical composition of occluded and free organic materials was investigated by solid-state 13C CP/MAS NMR spectroscopy. Despite the differences in soils, environmental conditions and vegetation, the organic structure of the free light fraction was similar in four of the five soils. This fraction consisted of 55-63% O-alkyl C, 18-25% alkyl C, 14-18% aromatic C, and 5-7% carbonyl C. In the other soil, this fraction showed a higher proportion of alkyl C (31%) and lower O-alkyl C (46%). Most of the differences between soils were associated with organic materials contained in the occluded light fraction. The differences in chemical structure between the occluded light fraction and free light fractions were similar in all examined soils. The NMR data showed that the proportion of O-alkyl C was lower and alkyl C higher in the occluded light fractions than in the free light fractions. The proportion of aromatic and carbonyl carbon was higher in the occluded fractions of three soils while the percentage of these two types of carbon remained unchanged in the two other soils. It is considered that the occluded organic matter is an old pool of carbon that has been accreted within aggregates during decades of root growth and it is that pool which is lost due to cultivation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/sr9940285

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 810

Metadata

Authors
Golchin, A., Oades, J., Skjemstad, J., & Clarke, P.
Venue
Australian Journal of Soil Research
Published
1994-04-01
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
285-309
ISSN
  • 0004-9573 (ISSN-L)
  • 1446-568X
OpenAlex
W2033536091
Cited by
810
References
0
FWCI
10.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Study of free and occluded particulate organic matter in soils by solid state 13C Cp/MAS NMR spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/sr9940285
The paper
Golchin, A., Oades, J., Skjemstad, J., & Clarke, P. (1994). Study of free and occluded particulate organic matter in soils by solid state 13C Cp/MAS NMR spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Australian Journal of Soil Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/sr9940285

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.