The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of burn severity assessments using Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio and ground data
Abstract
Burn severity can be mapped using satellite data to detect changes in forest structure and moisture content caused by fires. The 2001 Leroux fire on the Coconino National Forest, Arizona, burned over 18 pre-existing permanent 0.1 ha plots. Plots were re-measured following the fire. Landsat 7 ETM+ imagery and the Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (ΔNBR) were used to map the fire into four severity levels immediately following the fire (July 2001) and 1 year after the fire (June 2002). Ninety-two Composite Burn Index (CBI) plots were compared to the fire severity maps. Pre- and post-fire plot measurements were also analysed according to their imagery classification. Ground measurements demonstrated differences in forest structure. Areas that were classified as severely burned on the imagery were predominantly Pinus ponderosa stands. Tree density and basal area, snag density and fine fuel accumulation were associated with severity levels. Tree mortality was not greatest in severely burned areas, indicating that the ΔNBR is comprehensive in rating burn severity by incorporating multiple forest strata. While the ΔNBR was less accurate at mapping perimeters, the method was reliable for mapping severely burned areas that may need immediate or long-term post-fire recovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aspen: Ecology and management in the western United States
DeByle, N. V., & Winokur, R. P. (1985) · doi:10.2737/rm-gtr-119 · Cited by 457
Swetnam, T. W., & Baisan, C. H. (2003) · Ecological Studies · doi:10.1007/0-387-21710-x_6 · Cited by 221
Hartford, R., & Frandsen, W. (1992) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf9920139 · Cited by 220
Cited by
A Project for Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity
Eidenshink, J., Schwind, B., Brewer, K., Zhu, Z.-L., Quayle, B., & Howard, S. (2007) · Fire Ecology · doi:10.4996/fireecology.0301003 · Cited by 1,423
Miller, J. D., Safford, H. D., Crimmins, M., & Thode, A. E. (2009) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-008-9201-9 · Cited by 747
Post-fire vegetation and fuel development influences fire severity patterns in reburns
Coppoletta, M., Merriam, K. E., & Collins, B. M. (2016) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/15-0225 · Cited by 295
Rangeland Systems: Processes, Management and Challenges
(2017) · Springer Series on Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46709-2 · Cited by 197
Cansler, C. A., & McKenzie, D. (2012) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs4020456 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Cocke, A. E., Fulé, P. Z., & Crouse, J. E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Wildland Fire
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2005-05-16
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-198
- ISSN
- 1049-8001 (ISSN-L)
- 1448-5516
- OpenAlex
- W2118247391
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of burn severity assessments using Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio and ground data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/wf04010
- The paper
- Cocke, A. E., Fulé, P. Z., & Crouse, J. E. (2005). Comparison of burn severity assessments using Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio and ground data. International Journal of Wildland Fire. https://doi.org/10.1071/wf04010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.