The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling fire danger in data-poor regions: a case study from the Russian Far East
Abstract
Wildland fire is a widespread phenomenon that affects how many ecosystems function and often threatens human life and property. Development of fire danger rating systems, aimed at identifying critical periods of high fire danger at early stages of its occurrence, is an important step for proactive fire and resource management. Development of such systems relies on long-term records of fire occurrence as well as numerous data sources for supporting information, but accurate and spatially explicit information is not available in many regions of the world affected by fire. Global satellite systems are becoming a major source of information for data-poor regions. The present paper describes a framework for modeling fire danger at a regional scale using publicly available data sources and global satellite imaging. It details a fuzzy logic-driven fire danger model developed for the Russian Far East using remotely sensed data. Fire activity recorded by the MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) active fire product was analyzed for 2001–05 as a function of various parameters. Model performance was evaluated against 2006 data. Fire danger was evaluated within the model using the ordered weighted averaging approach with fuzzification. The model produces three scenarios. All output model scenarios provide a meaningful representation of fire danger levels in the region with the ‘trade-off’ scenario being the most applicable to mapping fire danger during low fire activity seasons.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Globally, there are data on lightning strikes and human-ignition proxies, such as distance to roads, transportation corridors and railroad tracks (Andela et al., 2017;Loboda, 2009;Morton, Page, DeFries, Collatz, & Hurtt, 2013).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Loboda, 2009
Citations
Cites
The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire
Bond, W. J., Woodward, F. I., & Midgley, G. F. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01252.x · Cited by 1,942
Cochrane, M. A. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01437 · Cited by 1,218
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers
McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729
Metadata
- Authors
- Loboda, T. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Loboda, Tatiana V.
- ORCID
- Loboda, Tatiana V.
- Venue
- International Journal of Wildland Fire
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2009-02-17
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-35
- ISSN
- 1049-8001 (ISSN-L)
- 1448-5516
- OpenAlex
- W2074379783
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Wildland Fire (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Panthera
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Fire Detection and Safety Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Fire dynamics and safety research
- Keywords
- fire danger rating, forest fires, fuzzy logic, satellite remote sensing, ordered weighted averaging, fuzzification, fire danger mapping, data-scarce regions, Russian Far East, fire management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review