Cited by 125Fire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementForest Management and Policy

Climate, lightning ignitions, and fire severity in Yosemite National Park, California, USA

Lutz, James A., van Wagtendonk, Jan W., Thode, Andrea E., Miller, Jay D., Franklin, Jerry F.·2009·International Journal of Wildland Fire

Abstract

Continental-scale studies of western North America have attributed recent increases in annual area burned and fire size to a warming climate, but these studies have focussed on large fires and have left the issues of fire severity and ignition frequency unaddressed. Lightning ignitions, any of which could burn a large area given appropriate conditions for fire spread, could be the first indication of more frequent fire. We examined the relationship between snowpack and the ignition and size of fires that occurred in Yosemite National Park, California (area 3027 km2), between 1984 and 2005. During this period, 1870 fires burned 77 718 ha. Decreased spring snowpack exponentially increased the number of lightning-ignited fires. Snowpack mediated lightning-ignited fires by decreasing the proportion of lightning strikes that caused lightning-ignited fires and through fewer lightning strikes in years with deep snowpack. We also quantified fire severity for the 103 fires >40 ha with satellite fire-severity indices using 23 years of Landsat Thematic Mapper data. The proportion of the landscape that burned at higher severities and the complexity of higher-severity burn patches increased with the log10 of annual area burned. Using one snowpack forecast, we project that the number of lightning-ignited fires will increase 19.1% by 2020 to 2049 and the annual area burned at high severity will increase 21.9%. Climate-induced decreases in snowpack and the concomitant increase in fire severity suggest that existing assumptions may be understated – fires may become more frequent and more severe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/wf08117

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lutz, J. A., van Wagtendonk, J. W., Thode, A. E., Miller, J. D., & Franklin, J. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • BUS Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Yosemite Field Station, El Portal, CA 95318, USA.
  • Northern Arizona University (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
Corresponding author
Lutz, James A.
Venue
International Journal of Wildland Fire
Published
2009-10-27
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
765-774
ISSN
  • 1049-8001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1448-5516
OpenAlex
W2099538950
Cited by
125
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Wildland Fire (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
lightning ignition, fire severity, snowpack, climate change, forest fires, Yosemite National Park, Landsat, climate change projections, fire frequency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review