Cited by 67Fire effects on ecosystemsDisaster Management and ResilienceRangeland and Wildlife Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of defensible space on the likelihood of house impact from wildfires in forested landscapes of south eastern Australia

Penman, Sandra H., Price, Owen F., Penman, Trent D., Bradstock, Ross A.·2019·International Journal of Wildland Fire

Abstract

The number of houses at risk from wildfire continues to increase around the world as populations continue to expand into fire-prone areas. Creating defensible space (managing fuels within a 30-m zone around a house) is a key strategy for mitigating risk, but there is a need to evaluate the key components of defensible space. This study examined house impact in 27 independent forest fires from New South Wales, Australia, between 2001 and 2009, comprising 309 houses destroyed or damaged and 618 unburnt houses. A range of spatial measures of vegetation, nearby buildings, waterbodies and topography were measured around each house. Principle Components Analysis and Generalised Additive Mixed Model analysis was used to derive the best and supported alternative models to explain the determinants of housing impact. The best model contained positive effects of vegetation touching the house and estimated Radiant Heat Flux and negative effects of distance to the nearest building and the number of nearby waterbodies on the probability of impact. The results suggest that risk could be effectively reduced by providing waterbodies, maintaining defensible space and ensuring separation between houses.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/wf18046

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The potential influence of housing density on structure losses in wildfires has varied, with some studies finding a greater probability of loss at higher housing densities, while other studies have reported a greater risk at lower housing densities.

    “However, the potential influence of housing density on structure losses in wildfires has varied, with some studies finding a greater probability of loss at higher housing densities (Price and Bradstock 2013; Penman et al. 2019), while other studies have reported a greater risk at lower housing densities (Syphard et al. 2012, 2014, 2017).”
  • Amount of near-home combustible vegetation has been linked to the probability of home loss in wildfires.

    “Amount of near-home combustible vegetation has also been linked to the probability of home loss in wildfires (Price and Bradstock 2013; Syphard et al. 2014; Penman et al. 2019).”
  • Other analyses of destructive wildfires show housing density to be strongly associated with home loss.

    “Our findings are consistent with other analyses of destructive wildfires showing housing density to be strongly associated with home loss (Price and Bradstock 2013; Penman et al. 2019), but in contrast to Syphard et al. (2012, 2014, 2017) and Syphard and Keeley (2020), who have reported reduced probability of home loss at higher housing densities.”
  • One of the primary mechanisms for radiant heat impact on buildings is the breaking of window glass, which can allow embers to enter the building.

    “One of the primary mechanisms for radiant heat impact is the breaking of window glass, which can allow embers to enter the building (Penman et al. 2019).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Penman, S. H., Price, O. F., Penman, T. D., & Bradstock, R. A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
Corresponding author
Price, Owen F.
Venue
International Journal of Wildland Fire
Published
2018-12-19
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
4-14
ISSN
  • 1049-8001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1448-5516
OpenAlex
W2903757790
Cited by
66
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Wildland Fire (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
defensible space, fuel management, radiant heat flux, water bodies, topography, fire-prone landscapes, New South Wales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review