The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An analysis of Arthropod succession in Carrion and the effect of its decomposiion on the soil fauna.
Abstract
The present study falls into two clearly defined parts, one dealing with the succession of carrion-frequenting organisms in dead guinea pigs, the other examining the influence of carrion on the typical soil fauna of a sclerophyll woodland. Five different stages of carcass decomposition were recognized and these were correlated with the animal communities occupying them. These communities were contrasted with the community dwelling in the leaf litter and soil. The various stages of decomposition affected the underlying soil differently, the greatest effect being observed during the "black putrefaction" and "butyric fermentation" stages. During the black putrefaction stage, body fluids which passed into the soil formed a cemented crust with the plant litter and the upper soil layer. The liquified decomposition products during the butyric fermentation stage destroyed the underlying plants as well as the soil fauna. The decomposition resulted in the production of two distinct zones in the upper soil layers which differed both physically and in arthropod populations from a control area. The fauna of the "carrion zone", i.e. the area beneath the carcass, differed greatly from that of the control area. The fauna of the "intermediate zone", i.e. the belt surrounding the carrion 10 cm wide, also showed substantial differences. Only carrion dwellers were present in the carrion zone, whereas both these and soil dwellers were present in the intermediate zone. The decomposition of carrion had a marked effect on the soil fauna to a depth of 14 cm, but this was less drastic than in the upper soil layers. The reinvasion of the carrion zone by soil arthropods was not completed after a year. At the end of the study period, subterranean forms were better re-established than soil-surface or litter dwellers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Early post-mortem changes and stages of decomposition in exposed cadavers
Lee Goff, M. (2009) · Experimental and Applied Acarology · doi:10.1007/s10493-009-9284-9 · Cited by 266
Simmons, T., Adlam, R. E., & Moffatt, C. (2010) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01206.x · Cited by 241
Adlam, R. E., & Simmons, T. (2007) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00510.x · Cited by 141
Differential Decomposition Among Pig, Rabbit, and Human Remains
Dautartas, A., Kenyhercz, M. W., Vidoli, G. M., Meadows Jantz, L., Mundorff, A., & Steadman, D. W. (2018) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.13784 · Cited by 127
Stokes, K. L., Forbes, S. L., & Tibbett, M. (2013) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12115 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Bornemissza, G.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1957-03-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 0004-959X (ISSN-L)
- 1446-5698
- OpenAlex
- W1984978281
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An analysis of Arthropod succession in Carrion and the effect of its decomposiion on the soil fauna. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/zo9570001
- The paper
- Bornemissza, G. (1957). An analysis of Arthropod succession in Carrion and the effect of its decomposiion on the soil fauna. Australian Journal of Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1071/zo9570001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.