The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis fails to support the latency model for regulation of p53 DNA binding activity in vivo
Open accessAbstract
p53 can adopt two forms in vitro , a latent form that binds naked DNA poorly and an active form that binds DNA well. Conversion of the latent form to the active form is thought to occur by an allosteric mechanism induced by phosphorylation and acetylation. Despite the large differences in affinity produced by regulatory modifications in vitro , mutation of putative regulatory sites has not produced correspondingly large effects on transcription of p53 target genes in vivo . To determine whether genotoxic stress regulates DNA binding by p53 in vivo , we have performed quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays on tumor and normal cell lines containing wild-type p53. ChIP recovers several hundredfold more p21 and MDM2 promoter DNA from p53 wild-type than p53-null cells, indicating that the assay is specific for p53. Genotoxic stress induces much smaller increases in chromatin precipitation, which are matched by changes in the p53 protein level. Thus, in the experimental systems tested, allosteric regulation of DNA binding is not a major level of regulation of p53 activity. The p53 target genes tested can be divided into a group showing high promoter occupancy in vivo (p21, MDM2, and PUMA) and a group giving substantially weaker or background p53 binding (bax, AIP1, and PIG3). Neither group shows selective recruitment of p53 to the promoter in cells undergoing apoptosis, indicating that the decision to undergo apoptosis or cell cycle arrest depends on other changes in the cell.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Requirement for p53 and p21 to Sustain G 2 Arrest After DNA Damage
Bunz, F., Dutriaux, A., Lengauer, C., Waldman, T., Zhou, S., Brown, J. P., Sedivy, J. M., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5393.1497 · Cited by 2,803
Crystal Structure of a p53 Tumor Suppressor-DNA Complex: Understanding Tumorigenic Mutations
Cho, Y., Gorina, S., Jeffrey, P. D., & Pavletich, N. P. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8023157 · Cited by 2,551
Disruption of p53 in human cancer cells alters the responses to therapeutic agents.
Bunz, F., Hwang, P. M., Torrance, C., Waldman, T., Zhang, Y., Dillehay, L., Williams, J., Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci6863 · Cited by 1,044
DNA damage induces phosphorylation of the amino terminus of p53
Siliciano, J. D., Canman, C. E., Taya, Y., Sakaguchi, K., Appella, E., & Kastan, M. B. (1997) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.11.24.3471 · Cited by 818
Regulation of p53 function and stability by phosphorylation.
Ashcroft, M., Kubbutat, M. H. G., & Vousden, K. H. (1999) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.19.3.1751 · Cited by 452
Putative telomere-independent mechanisms of replicative aging reflect inadequate growth conditions
Ramirez, R. D., Morales, C. P., Herbert, B.-S., Rohde, J. M., Passons, C., Shay, J. W., & Wright, W. E. (2001) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.859201 · Cited by 444
Cited by
Mitochondrial membrane permeabilization in cell death
Kroemer, G., Galluzzi, L., & Brenner, C. (2007) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00013.2006 · Cited by 3,598
Kruse, J.-P., & Gu, W. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.050 · Cited by 1,610
The Cell–Cycle Arrest and Apoptotic Functions of p53 in Tumor Initiation and Progression
Chen, J. (2016) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a026104 · Cited by 1,222
The multiple mechanisms that regulate p53 activity and cell fate
Hafner, A., Bulyk, M. L., Jambhekar, A., & Lahav, G. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0110-x · Cited by 1,129
A Global Map of p53 Transcription-Factor Binding Sites in the Human Genome
Wei, C.-L., Wu, Q., Vega, V. B., Chiu, K. P., Ng, P., Zhang, T., Shahab, A., Yong, H. C., Fu, Y., Weng, Z., et al. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.043 · Cited by 1,141
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaeser, M. D., & Iggo, R. D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-12-26
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-100
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2039760853
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 8.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis fails to support the latency model for regulation of p53 DNA binding activity in vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.012283399
- The paper
- Kaeser, M. D., & Iggo, R. D. (2002). Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis fails to support the latency model for regulation of p53 DNA binding activity in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.012283399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.