Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Membrane protease proteomics: Isotope-coded affinity tag MS identification of undescribed MT1–matrix metalloproteinase substrates

Tam, Eric M., Morrison, Charlotte J., Wu, Yi I., Stack, M. Sharon, Overall, Christopher M.·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

By proteolytic modification of low abundant signaling proteins and membrane receptors, proteases exert potent posttranslational control over cell behavior at the postsecretion level. Hence, substrate discovery is indispensable for understanding the biological role of proteases in vivo . Indeed, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), long associated with extracellular matrix degradation, are increasingly recognized as important processing enzymes of bioactive molecules. MS is now the primary proteomic technique for detecting, identifying, and quantitating proteins in cells or tissues. Here we used isotopecoded affinity tag labeling and multidimensional liquid chromatography inline with tandem MS to identify MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cell proteins shed from the cell surface or the pericellular matrix and extracellular proteins that were degraded or processed after transfection with human membrane type 1-MMP (MT1-MMP). Potential substrates were identified as those having altered protein levels compared with the E240A inactive MT1-MMP mutant or vector transfectants. New substrates were biochemically confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time-of-flight MS and Edman sequencing of cleavage fragments after incubation with recombinant soluble MT1-MMP in vitro . We report many previously uncharacterized substrates of MT1-MMP, including the neutrophil chemokine IL-8, secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor, pro-tumor necrosis factor α, death receptor-6, and connective tissue growth factor, indicating that MT1-MMP is an important signaling protease in addition to its traditionally ascribed roles in pericellular matrix remodeling. Moreover, the high-throughput and quantitative nature of isotope-coded affinity tag labeling combined with tandem MS sequencing is a previously undescribed degradomic screen for protease substrate discovery that should be generally adaptable to other classes of protease for exploring proteolytic function in complex and dynamic biological contexts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0305862101

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1038/nrg1111 · DOI
  2. 10.1517/14728222.7.3.385 · DOI
  3. 10.1073/pnas.140132697 · DOI
  4. 10.1073/pnas.061028898 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/90273 · DOI
  6. 10.1074/jbc.M004538200 · DOI
  7. 10.1515/BC.2002.114 · DOI
  8. 10.1126/science.289.5482.1202 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1987.tb01544.x · DOI
  10. 10.1042/bj3050799 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nrm858 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1074/mcp.M100020-MCP200 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1002/mas.1280110402 · DOI
  14. 10.1074/jbc.274.31.21491 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80064-1 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/S0304-3835(02)00699-7 · DOI
  17. 10.1074/jbc.272.4.2446 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1074/jbc.M206874200 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/370061a0 · DOI
  20. 10.1074/jbc.M108643200 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)87018-8 · DOI
  22. Bigg, H. F., Morrison, C. J., Butler, G. S., Bogoyevitch, M. A., Wang, Z., Soloway, P. D. & Overall, C. M. (2001) Cancer Res. 61, 3610-3618.11325829
  23. 10.1038/nn1127 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/ng1249 · DOI
  25. 10.1182/blood.V96.8.2673 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00791-1 · DOI
  27. 10.1172/JCI7091 · DOI
  28. 10.1210/edrv.20.2.0360 · DOI
  29. 10.1152/ajpregu.00738.2001 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/80489 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/eji.1830190706 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/019021402753462022 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02819.x · DOI
  34. 10.1074/jbc.M010135200 · DOI
  35. 10.1074/jbc.M010741200 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/385733a0 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1074/jbc.M201674200 · DOI
  38. 10.1095/biolreprod59.4.828 · DOI
  39. 10.1006/excr.1997.3548 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tam, E. M., Morrison, C. J., Wu, Y. I., Stack, M. S., & Overall, C. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-04-26
Volume
101
Issue
18
Pages
6917-6922
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
244
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review