The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electrical wound-healing assay for cells in vitro
Open accessAbstract
Confluent cell monolayers in tissue culture are fragile and can easily be mechanically disrupted, often leaving an area devoid of cells. This opening in the cell sheet is then repopulated, because the cells on the fringe of the damage, which are no longer contact-inhibited, move into the available space. This mechanical disruption is often done deliberately in a “wound-healing” assay as a means to assess the migration of the cells. In such assays, a scrape is made in the cell layer followed by microscopy to monitor the advance of the cells into the wound. We have found that these types of assays can also be accomplished electrically. In this approach, cells growing on small electrodes and monitored by using electric cell-substrate impedance sensing are subjected to currents, resulting in severe electroporation and subsequent cell death. After this invasive treatment, the electrode's impedance is again monitored to chart the migration and ultimate healing of the wound. We report here that this procedure to study cell behavior is both highly reproducible, quantitative, and provides data similar to that acquired with traditional measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Collective migration of an epithelial monolayer in response to a model wound
Poujade, M., Grasland-Mongrain, E., Hertzog, A., Jouanneau, J., Chavrier, P., Ladoux, B., Buguin, A., & Silberzan, P. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0705062104 · Cited by 912
An image J plugin for the high throughput image analysis of in vitro scratch wound healing assays
(2020) · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232565 · Cited by 851
Glial responses to implanted electrodes in the brain
Salatino, J. W., Ludwig, K. A., Kozai, T. D. Y., & Purcell, E. K. (2017) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-017-0154-1 · Cited by 642
Schreibelt, G., Kooij, G., Reijerkerk, A., van Doorn, R., Gringhuis, S. I., van der Pol, S., Weksler, B. B., Romero, I. A., Couraud, P., Piontek, J., et al. (2007) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.07-8329com · Cited by 347
Reijerkerk, A., Lopez-Ramirez, M. A., van het Hof, B., Drexhage, J. A. R., Kamphuis, W. W., Kooij, G., Vos, J. B., van der Pouw Kraan, T. C. T. M., van Zonneveld, A. J., Horrevoets, A. J., et al. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3965-12.2013 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Keese, C. R., Wegener, J., Walker, S. R., & Giaever, I.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-01-27
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1554-1559
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2012381843
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrical wound-healing assay for cells in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0307588100
- The paper
- Keese, C. R., Wegener, J., Walker, S. R., & Giaever, I. (2004). Electrical wound-healing assay for cells in vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307588100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.