The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Galactose-extended glycans of antibodies produced by transgenic plants
Open accessAbstract
Plant-specific N-glycosylation can represent an important limitation for the use of recombinant glycoproteins of mammalian origin produced by transgenic plants. Comparison of plant and mammalian N-glycan biosynthesis indicates that β1,4-galactosyltransferase is the most important enzyme that is missing for conversion of typical plant N-glycans into mammalian-like N-glycans. Here, the stable expression of human β1,4-galactosyltransferase in tobacco plants is described. Proteins isolated from transgenic tobacco plants expressing the mammalian enzyme bear N-glycans, of which about 15% exhibit terminal β1,4-galactose residues in addition to the specific plant N-glycan epitopes. The results indicate that the human enzyme is fully functional and localizes correctly in the Golgi apparatus. Despite the fact that through the modified glycosylation machinery numerous proteins have acquired unusual N-glycans with terminal β1,4-galactose residues, no obvious changes in the physiology of the transgenic plants are observed, and the feature is inheritable. The crossing of a tobacco plant expressing human β1,4-galactosyltransferase with a plant expressing the heavy and light chains of a mouse antibody results in the expression of a plantibody that exhibits partially galactosylated N-glycans (30%), which is approximately as abundant as when the same antibody is produced by hybridoma cells. These results are a major step in the in planta engineering of the N-glycosylation of recombinant antibodies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ioffe, E., & Stanley, P. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.2.728 · Cited by 400
Asano, M., Furukawa, K., Kido, M., Matsumoto, S., Umesaki, Y., Kochibe, N., & Iwakura, Y. (1997) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/16.8.1850 · Cited by 270
von Schaewen, A., Sturm, A., O'Neill, J., & Chrispeels, M. J. (1993) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.102.4.1109 · Cited by 251
Cited by
The production of recombinant pharmaceutical proteins in plants
Ma, J. K.-C., Drake, P. M. W., & Christou, P. (2003) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1177 · Cited by 960
Bardor, M. (2003) · Glycobiology · doi:10.1093/glycob/cwg024 · Cited by 334
Self-citationStrasser, R., Altmann, F., Mach, L., Glössl, J., & Steinkellner, H. (2004) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(04)00150-4 · Cited by 321
Karg, S. R., Frey, A. D., Ferrara, C., Streich, D. K., Umaña, P., & Kallio, P. T. (2009) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.10.005 · Cited by 19
van der Kaaij, A., van Noort, K., Nibbering, P., Wilbers, R. H. P., & Schots, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.882835 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Bakker, H., Bardor, M., Molthoff, J. W., Gomord, V., Elbers, I., Stevens, L. H., Jordi, W., Lommen, A., Faye, L., Lerouge, P., & Bosch, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-02-27
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2899-2904
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2038681957
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Galactose-extended glycans of antibodies produced by transgenic plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.031419998
- The paper
- Bakker, H., Bardor, M., Molthoff, J. W., Gomord, V., Elbers, I., Stevens, L. H., Jordi, W., Lommen, A., Faye, L., Lerouge, P., & Bosch, D. (2001). Galactose-extended glycans of antibodies produced by transgenic plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.031419998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.