The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Secretory granules are recaptured largely intact after stimulated exocytosis in cultured endocrine cells
Open accessAbstract
Classical cell biology teaches that exocytosis causes the membrane of exocytic vesicles to disperse into the cell surface and that a cell must later retrieve by molecular sorting whatever membrane components it wishes to keep inside. We have tested whether this view applies to secretory granules in intact PC-12 cells. Three granule proteins were labeled with fluorescent proteins in different colors, and two-color evanescent-field microscopy was used to view single granules during and after exocytosis. Whereas neuro-peptide Y was lost from granules in seconds, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and the membrane protein phogrin remained at the granule site for over 1 min, thus providing markers for postexocytic granules. When tPA was imaged simultaneously with cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) as a cytosolic marker, the volume occupied by the granule appeared as a dark spot where it excluded CFP. The spot remained even after tPA reported exocytosis, indicating that granules failed to flatten into the cell surface. Phogrin was labeled with GFP at its luminal end and used to sense the pH in granules. When exocytosis caused the acidic granule interior to neutralize, GFP–phogrin at first brightened and later dimmed again as the interior separated from the extracellular space and reacidified. Reacidification and dimming could be reversed by application of NH 4 Cl. We conclude that most granules reseal in <10 s after releasing cargo, and that these empty or partially empty granules are recaptured otherwise intact.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Insulin granule dynamics in pancreatic beta cells
Rorsman, P., & Renstr�m, E. (2003) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-003-1153-1 · Cited by 844
Saheki, Y., & De Camilli, P. (2012) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a005645 · Cited by 457
The Dynamic Control of Kiss-And-Run and Vesicular Reuse Probed with Single Nanoparticles
Zhang, Q., Li, Y., & Tsien, R. W. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1167373 · Cited by 366
Mechanisms, locations, and kinetics of synaptic BDNF secretion: An update
Leßmann, V., & Brigadski, T. (2009) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2009.06.004 · Cited by 337
The physiological role of α‐synuclein and its relationship to Parkinson’s Disease
Sulzer, D., & Edwards, R. H. (2019) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.14810 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Taraska, J. W., Perrais, D., Ohara-Imaizumi, M., Nagamatsu, S., & Almers, W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-01-21
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2070-2075
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2123878072
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Secretory granules are recaptured largely intact after stimulated exocytosis in cultured endocrine cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0337526100
- The paper
- Taraska, J. W., Perrais, D., Ohara-Imaizumi, M., Nagamatsu, S., & Almers, W. (2003). Secretory granules are recaptured largely intact after stimulated exocytosis in cultured endocrine cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0337526100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.