Cited by 844Pancreatic function and diabetesCellular transport and secretionDiabetes and associated disorders

Insulin granule dynamics in pancreatic beta cells

Open access
Rorsman, P., Renstr�m, E.·2003·Diabetologia

Abstract

Glucose-induced insulin secretion in response to a step increase in blood glucose concentrations follows a biphasic time course consisting of a rapid and transient first phase followed by a slowly developing and sustained second phase. Because Type 2 diabetes involves defects of insulin secretion, manifested as a loss of first phase and a reduction of second phase, it is important to understand the cellular mechanisms underlying biphasic insulin secretion. Insulin release involves the packaging of insulin in small (diameter approximately 0.3 micro m) secretory granules, the trafficking of these granules to the plasma membrane, the exocytotic fusion of the granules with the plasma membrane and eventually the retrieval of the secreted membranes by endocytosis. Until recently, studies on insulin secretion have been confined to the appearance of insulin in the extracellular space and the cellular events preceding exocytosis have been inaccessible to more detailed analysis. Evidence from a variety of secretory tissues, including pancreatic islet cells suggests, however, that the secretory granules can be functionally divided into distinct pools that are distinguished by their release competence and/or proximity to the plasma membrane. The introduction of fluorescent proteins that can be targeted to the secretory granules, in combination with the advent of new techniques that allow real-time imaging of granule trafficking in living cells (granule dynamics), has led to an explosion of our knowledge of the pre-exocytotic and post-exocytotic processes in the beta cell. Here we discuss these observations in relation to previous functional and ultra-structural data as well as the secretory defects of Type 2 diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-003-1153-1

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only a small fraction of secretory granules (<1%/h) undergo exocytosis even at high glucose concentrations.

    “Only a small fraction of the secretory granules (<1%/h) undergo exocytosis even at high glucose concentrations (571).”

    From Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men (2018) · cites this paper as [571]

    The Ultrastructural correlates of biphasic insulin secretion section (page unavailable) describes sustained glucose-stimulated secretion at 5 granules per minute per beta cell. The same section reports about 10,000 granules per mouse beta cell, making that rate approximately 3% per hour, not less than 1% per hour. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Granules belonging to the reserve pool have not yet acquired release competence and must undergo a series of ATP-, Ca2+- and temperature-dependent reactions ('mobilization' or 'priming') prior to exocytosis.

    “Granules belonging to the reserve pool have not yet acquired release competence and must undergo a series of ATP-, Ca2+- and temperature-dependent reactions (‘mobilization’ or ‘priming’) prior to exocytosis (571).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Malaisse WJ, Herchuelz, A (1982) Nutritional regulation of K + conductance: an unsettled aspect of pancreatic B cell physiology. In: Litwack G (ed.) Biochemical actions of hormones. Academic Press, New York, pp 69-92 106.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rorsman, P., & Renstr�m, E.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Rorsman, P.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2003-08-01
Volume
46
Issue
8
Pages
1029-1045
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2105955034
Cited by
844
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 46
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
insulin secretion, pancreatic beta cells, secretory granules, granule dynamics, first-phase insulin secretion, second-phase insulin secretion, type 2 diabetes, exocytosis, endocytosis, live-cell imaging, fluorescent protein markers
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Animals, Cytoplasmic Granules, Diabetes Mellitus, Endocytosis, Exocytosis, Humans, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Models, Biological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review