The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
No evidence for new dopaminergic neurons in the adult mammalian substantia nigra
Open accessAbstract
A recent report by Zhao et al. [Zhao, M., Momma, S., Delfani, K., Carlen, M., Cassidy, R. M., Johansson, C. B., Brismar, H., Shupliakov, O., Frisen, J. & Janson, A. M. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7925–7930] suggests that dopaminergic neurons, the cell type lost in Parkinson's disease, are continuously generated in the adult substantia nigra pars compacta. Using similar methodological procedures to label dividing cells, we found no evidence of new dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, either in normal or 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned hemi-Parkinsonian rodents, or even after growth factor treatment. Furthermore, we found no evidence of neural stem cells emanating from the cerebroventricular system and migrating to the substantia nigra. We conclude that it is unlikely that dopaminergic neurons are generated in the adult mammalian substantia nigra.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
West, M. J., Slomianka, L., & Gundersen, H. J. G. (1991) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.1092310411 · Cited by 2,994
Neuronal replacement from endogenous precursors in the adult brain after stroke
Arvidsson, A., Collin, T., Kirik, D., Kokaia, Z., & Lindvall, O. (2002) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm747 · Cited by 2,799
Cited by
PDGFRA/NG2 glia generate myelinating oligodendrocytes and piriform projection neurons in adult mice
Rivers, L. E., Young, K. M., Rizzi, M., Jamen, F., Psachoulia, K., Wade, A., Kessaris, N., & Richardson, W. D. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2220 · Cited by 961
Toxin-induced models of Parkinson’s disease
Bové, J., Prou, D., Perier, C., & Przedborski, S. (2005) · NeuroRX · doi:10.1602/neurorx.2.3.484 · Cited by 739
Taupin, P. (2007) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.08.002 · Cited by 645
Bharali, D. J., Klejbor, I., Stachowiak, E. K., Dutta, P., Roy, I., Kaur, N., Bergey, E. J., Prasad, P. N., & Stachowiak, M. K. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504926102 · Cited by 622
Chu, Y., & Kordower, J. H. (2007) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2006.08.021 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Frielingsdorf, H., Schwarz, K., Brundin, P., & Mohapel, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-06-21
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 10177-10182
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2047093218
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: No evidence for new dopaminergic neurons in the adult mammalian substantia nigra. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0401229101
- The paper
- Frielingsdorf, H., Schwarz, K., Brundin, P., & Mohapel, P. (2004). No evidence for new dopaminergic neurons in the adult mammalian substantia nigra. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401229101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.