The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robustness properties of circadian clock architectures
Open accessAbstract
Robustness, a relative insensitivity to perturbations, is a key characteristic of living cells. However, the specific structural characteristics that are responsible for robust performance are not clear, even in genetic circuits of moderate complexity. Formal sensitivity analysis allows the investigation of robustness and fragility properties of mathematical models representing regulatory networks, but it yields only local properties with respect to a particular choice of parameter values. Here, we show that by systematically investigating the parameter space, more global properties linked to network structure can be derived. Our analysis focuses on the genetic oscillator responsible for generating circadian rhythms in Drosophila as a prototypic dynamical cellular system. Analysis of two mathematical models of moderate complexity shows that the tradeoff between robustness and fragility is largely determined by the regulatory structure. Rank-ordered sensitivities, for instance, allow the correct identification of protein phosphorylation as an influential process determining the oscillator's period. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis confirms the theoretical insight that hierarchical control might be important for achieving robustness. The complex feedback structures encountered in vivo , however, do not seem to enhance robustness per se but confer robust precision and adjustability of the clock while avoiding catastrophic failure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An h Per2 Phosphorylation Site Mutation in Familial Advanced Sleep Phase Syndrome
Toh, K. L., Jones, C. R., He, Y., Eide, E. J., Hinz, W. A., Virshup, D. M., Ptáček, L. J., & Fu, Y.-H. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1057499 · Cited by 1,460
Reverse engineering of biological complexity
Csete, M. E., & Doyle, J. C. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069981 · Cited by 1,215
Metabolic network structure determines key aspects of functionality and regulation
Stelling, J., Klamt, S., Bettenbrock, K., Schuster, S., & Gilles, E. D. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01166 · Cited by 802
Self-citation
Cited by
Robustness of cellular functions
Stelling, J., Sauer, U., Szallasi, Z., Doyle, F. J., & Doyle, J. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.008 · Cited by 1,049
Self-citationHaidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2008) · The Innate Mind, Volume 3 · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019 · Cited by 650
Kell, D. B. (2009) · BMC Medical Genomics · doi:10.1186/1755-8794-2-2 · Cited by 554
Clocks not winding down: unravelling circadian networks
Zhang, E. E., & Kay, S. A. (2010) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2995 · Cited by 446
Robustness can evolve gradually in complex regulatory gene networks with varying topology
Ciliberti, S., Martin, O. C., & Wagner, A. (2007) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030015 · Cited by 390
Metadata
- Authors
- Stelling, J., Gilles, E. D., & Doyle, F. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-08-30
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 13210-13215
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2092309107
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robustness properties of circadian clock architectures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0401463101
- The paper
- Stelling, J., Gilles, E. D., & Doyle, F. J. (2004). Robustness properties of circadian clock architectures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401463101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.