Cited by 129

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NF-κB-mediated repression of growth arrest- and DNA-damage-inducible proteins 45α and γ is essential for cancer cell survival

Zerbini, Luiz F., Wang, Yihong, Czibere, Akos, Correa, Ricardo G., Cho, Je-Yoel, Ijiri, Kosei, Wei, Wanjang, Joseph, Marie, Gu, Xuesong, Grall, Franck, Goldring, Mary B., Zhou, Jin-Rhong, Libermann, Towia A.·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The NF-κB/IκB signaling pathway is a critical regulator of cell survival in cancer. Here, we report that combined down-regulation of growth arrest- and DNA-damage-inducible proteins (GADD)45α and γ expression by NF-κB is an essential step for various cancer types to escape programmed cell death. We demonstrate that inhibition of NF-κB in cancer cells results in GADD45α- and γ-dependent induction of apoptosis and inhibition of tumor growth. Inhibition of GADD45α and γ in cancer cells by small interfering RNA abrogates apoptosis induction by the inhibitor of NF-κB and blocks c-Jun N-terminal kinase activation, whereas overexpression of GADD45α and γ activates c-Jun N-terminal kinase and induces apoptosis. These results establish an unambiguous role for the GADD45 family as an essential mediator of cell survival in cancer cells with implications for cancer chemotherapy and novel drug discovery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0402069101

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1038/nrc780 · DOI
  2. Zerbini, L. F., Wang, Y., Cho, J. Y. & Libermann, T. A. (2003) Cancer Res. 63, 2206–2215.12727841
  3. 10.1182/blood.V87.3.1104.bloodjournal8731104 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1093/carcin/24.3.377 · DOI
  5. 10.1172/JCI11991 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.288.5467.870 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/380075a0 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/35104568 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Hall, P. A., Kearsey, J. M., Coates, P. J., Norman, D. G., Warbrick, E. & Cox, L. S. (1995) Oncogene 10, 2427–2433.7784094
  10. Chen, I. T., Akamatsu, M., Smith, M. L., Lung, F. D., Duba, D., Roller, P. P., Fornace, A. J., Jr., & O'Connor, P. M. (1996) Oncogene 12, 595–607.8637717
  11. De Smaele, E., Zazzeroni, F., Papa, S., Nguyen, D. U., Jin, R., Jones, J., Cong, R. & Franzoso, G. (2001) Nature 15, 308–313.
  12. 10.1038/424741a · DOI
  13. 10.1128/MCB.22.13.4544-4555.2002 · DOI
  14. 10.1128/mcb.14.12.8376-8384.1994 · DOI
  15. Bondeson, J., Brennan, F., Foxwell, B. & Feldmann, M. (2000) J. Rheumatol. 27, 2078–2089.10990217
  16. 10.1002/pros.10141 · DOI
  17. 10.1073/pnas.0437912100 · DOI
  18. 10.1146/annurev.genom.2.1.177 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81619-0 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206034 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207487 · DOI
  22. Harki, D. P., Bean, J. M., Miklos, D., Song, Y. H., Truong, V. B., Englert, C., Christians, F. C., Ellisen, L. W., Maheswaran, S., Oliner, J. D. & Haber, D. A. (1998) Cell 97, 575–586.
  23. 10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00141-8 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Tran, H., Brunet, A., Grenier, J. M., Datta, S. R., Fornace, A. J., Jr., DiStefano, P. S., Chiang, L. W. & Greenberg, M. E. (2002) Science 29, 6530–6534.
  25. 10.1002/jcp.10140 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb38657.x · DOI
  27. 10.1038/35104735 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Zerbini, L. F., Wang, Y., Czibere, A., Correa, R. G., Cho, J.-Y., Ijiri, K., Wei, W., Joseph, M., Gu, X., Grall, F., Goldring, M. B., Zhou, J.-R., & Libermann, T. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-09-07
Volume
101
Issue
37
Pages
13618-13623
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
129
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review