Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 471

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic deletion of ghrelin does not decrease food intake but influences metabolic fuel preference

Open access
Wortley, Katherine E., Anderson, Keith D., Garcia, Karen, Murray, Jane D., Malinova, Lubomira, Liu, Rong, Moncrieffe, Marshena, Thabet, Karen, Cox, Hilary J., Yancopoulos, George D., Wiegand, Stanley J., Sleeman, Mark W.·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Ghrelin is a recently identified growth hormone (GH) secretogogue whose administration not only induces GH release but also stimulates food intake, increases adiposity, and reduces fat utilization in mice. The effect on food intake appears to be independent of GH release and instead due to direct activation of orexigenic neurons in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus. The effects of ghrelin administration on food intake have led to the suggestion that inhibitors of endogenous ghrelin could be useful in curbing appetite and combating obesity. To further study the role of endogenous ghrelin in appetite and body weight regulation, we generated ghrelin-deficient ( ghrl –/– ) mice, in which the ghrelin gene was precisely replaced with a lacZ reporter gene. ghrl –/– mice were viable and exhibited normal growth rates as well as normal spontaneous food intake patterns, normal basal levels of hypothalamic orexigenic and anorexigenic neuropeptides, and no impairment of reflexive hyperphagia after fasting. These results indicate that endogenous ghrelin is not an essential regulator of food intake and has, at most, a redundant role in the regulation of appetite. However, analyses of ghrl –/– mice demonstrate that endogenous ghrelin plays a prominent role in determining the type of metabolic substrate (i.e., fat vs. carbohydrate) that is used for maintenance of energy balance, particularly under conditions of high fat intake.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0402763101

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 471

Metadata

Authors
Wortley, K. E., Anderson, K. D., Garcia, K., Murray, J. D., Malinova, L., Liu, R., Moncrieffe, M., Thabet, K., Cox, H. J., Yancopoulos, G. D., Wiegand, S. J., & Sleeman, M. W.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-05-17
Volume
101
Issue
21
Pages
8227-8232
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2129528230
Cited by
471
References
5
FWCI
13.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic deletion of ghrelin does not decrease food intake but influences metabolic fuel preference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0402763101
The paper
Wortley, K. E., Anderson, K. D., Garcia, K., Murray, J. D., Malinova, L., Liu, R., Moncrieffe, M., Thabet, K., Cox, H. J., Yancopoulos, G. D., Wiegand, S. J., & Sleeman, M. W. (2004). Genetic deletion of ghrelin does not decrease food intake but influences metabolic fuel preference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402763101

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.