The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A directed screen for genes involved in Drosophila blood cell activation
Open accessAbstract
An attack by a parasitic wasp activates a vigorous cellular immune response in Drosophila larvae. This response is manifested by an increased number of circulating cells, the hemocytes, and by the appearance of a specialized class of hemocyte, the lamellocytes, which participate in the encapsulation and killing of the parasite. To study the molecular mechanisms of this response, we have overexpressed different genes in the hemocytes, by using the GAL4-upstream activating sequence system and a hemocyte-specific Hemese-GAL4 driver. Multiple transgenes were tested, representing several important signaling pathways. We found that the proliferation response and the activation of lamellocyte formation are independent phenomena. A drastic increase in the number of circulating hemocytes is caused by receptor tyrosine kinases, such as Egfr , Pvr , and Alk , as well as by the downstream signaling components Ras85D and pointed , supporting the notion that the Ras–mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway regulates hemocyte numbers. In the case of Pvr and Alk , this phenotype also is accompanied by lamellocyte formation. By contrast, constitutively active hopscotch and hemipterous give massive activation of lamellocyte formation with little or no increase in total hemocyte numbers. This finding indicates that both the Jak/Stat and the Jun kinase pathways affect lamellocyte formation. Still other signals, mediated by aop ACT , Toll 10b , and Rac1 expression, cause a simultaneous increase in lamellocyte and total cell numbers, and the same effect is seen when WNT signaling is suppressed. We conclude that the activation of a cellular response is complex and affected by multiple signaling pathways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes
Brand, A. H., & Perrimon, N. (1993) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.118.2.401 · Cited by 9,612
Fusion of a Kinase Gene, ALK , to a Nucleolar Protein Gene, NPM , in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Morris, S. W., Kirstein, M. N., Valentine, M. B., Dittmer, K. G., Shapiro, D. N., Saltman, D. L., & Look, A. T. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8122112 · Cited by 2,409
Drosophila — A Practical Approach
(1987) · Biochemical Education · doi:10.1016/0307-4412(87)90074-4 · Cited by 1,802
Insect hemocytes and their role in immunity
Lavine, M. D., & Strand, M. R. (2002) · Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0965-1748(02)00092-9 · Cited by 1,632
The immune response of Drosophila
Hoffmann, J. A. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02021 · Cited by 1,553
GAL4 system in drosophila: A fly geneticist's swiss army knife
Duffy, J. B. (2002) · genesis · doi:10.1002/gene.10150 · Cited by 1,094
The Role of Hemocytes in Anopheles gambiae Antiplasmodial Immunity
Ramirez, J. L., Garver, L. S., Brayner, F. A., Alves, L. C., Rodrigues, J., Molina-Cruz, A., & Barillas-Mury, C. (2014) · Journal of Innate Immunity · doi:10.1159/000353765 · Cited by 1,084
Drosophila: a laboratory manual
(1990) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/0168-9525(90)90257-7 · Cited by 1,074
Postembryonic Hematopoiesis in Drosophila
Lanot, R., Zachary, D., Holder, F., & Meister, M. (2001) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1006/dbio.2000.0123 · Cited by 633
Drosophila immunity: paths and patterns
Hultmark, D. (2003) · Current Opinion in Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0952-7915(02)00005-5 · Cited by 600
Self-citation
Cited by
The Drosophila Toll Signaling Pathway
Valanne, S., Wang, J.-H., & Rämet, M. (2011) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1002302 · Cited by 894
Nimrod, a Putative Phagocytosis Receptor with EGF Repeats in Drosophila Plasmatocytes
Kurucz, É., Márkus, R., Zsámboki, J., Folkl-Medzihradszky, K., Darula, Z., Vilmos, P., Udvardy, A., Krausz, I., Lukacsovich, T., Gateff, E., et al. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.02.041 · Cited by 347
Self-citationAn innate immune response of blood cells to tumors and tissue damage in Drosophila
Pastor-Pareja, J. C., Wu, M., & Xu, T. (2008) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.000950 · Cited by 309
Canonical and non-canonical JAK–STAT signaling
Li, W. X. (2008) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2008.08.008 · Cited by 290
Role and Importance of Phenoloxidase in Insect Hemostasis
Eleftherianos, I., & Revenis, C. (2011) · Journal of Innate Immunity · doi:10.1159/000321931 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Zettervall, C.-J., Anderl, I., Williams, M. J., Palmer, R., Kurucz, E., Ando, I., & Hultmark, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-09-20
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 14192-14197
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2054652369
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A directed screen for genes involved in Drosophila blood cell activation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0403789101
- The paper
- Zettervall, C.-J., Anderl, I., Williams, M. J., Palmer, R., Kurucz, E., Ando, I., & Hultmark, D. (2004). A directed screen for genes involved in Drosophila blood cell activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403789101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.