The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-scale interactions, nonlinearities, and forecasting catastrophic events
Open accessAbstract
Catastrophic events share characteristic nonlinear behaviors that are often generated by cross-scale interactions and feedbacks among system elements. These events result in surprises that cannot easily be predicted based on information obtained at a single scale. Progress on catastrophic events has focused on one of the following two areas: nonlinear dynamics through time without an explicit consideration of spatial connectivity [Holling, C. S. (1992)Ecol. Monogr.62, 447–502] or spatial connectivity and the spread of contagious processes without a consideration of cross-scale interactions and feedbacks [Zeng, N., Neeling, J. D., Lau, L. M. & Tucker, C. J. (1999)Science 286, 1537–1540]. These approaches rarely have ventured beyond traditional disciplinary boundaries. We provide an interdisciplinary, conceptual, and general mathematical framework for understanding and forecasting nonlinear dynamics through time and across space. We illustrate the generality and usefulness of our approach by using new data and recasting published data from ecology (wildfires and desertification), epidemiology (infectious diseases), and engineering (structural failures). We show that decisions that minimize the likelihood of catastrophic events must be based on cross-scale interactions, and such decisions will often be counterintuitive. Given the continuing challenges associated with global change, approaches that cross disciplinary boundaries to include interactions and feedbacks at multiple scales are needed to increase our ability to predict catastrophic events and develop strategies for minimizing their occurrence and impacts. Our framework is an important step in developing predictive tools and designing experiments to examine cross-scale interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strogatz, S. H. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35065725 · Cited by 8,302
Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C., & Walker, B. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35098000 · Cited by 7,510
Biological Feedbacks in Global Desertification
Schlesinger, W. H., Reynolds, J. F., Cunningham, G. L., Huenneke, L. F., Jarrell, W. M., Virginia, R. A., & Whitford, W. G. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4946.1043 · Cited by 2,508
(1988) · World Health Organization eBooks · Cited by 1,574
Cross‐Scale Morphology, Geometry, and Dynamics of Ecosystems
Holling, C. S. (1992) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937313 · Cited by 1,472
Mesoscale Meteorological Modeling
(2002) · International Geophysics · doi:10.1016/s0074-6142(02)x8053-x · Cited by 1,191
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-4491 · Cited by 1,177
Drought-induced shift of a forest–woodland ecotone: Rapid landscape response to climate variation
Allen, C. D., & Breshears, D. D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14839 · Cited by 1,088
Self-citationAssessing the impacts of global warming on forest pest dynamics
Logan, J. A., Régnière, J., & Powell, J. A. (2003) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0130:atiogw]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 872
The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions
Keeling, M. J. (1999) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0716 · Cited by 798
Cited by
Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene
Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T. M., Folke, C., Liverman, D., Summerhayes, C. P., Barnosky, A. D., Cornell, S. E., Crucifix, M., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1810141115 · Cited by 3,139
Allen, C. D., Breshears, D. D., & McDowell, N. G. (2015) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1890/es15-00203.1 · Cited by 2,642
Self-citationPausas, J. G., & Fernández-Muñoz, S. (2012) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0060-6 · Cited by 826
A biogeographic model of fire regimes in Australia: current and future implications
Bradstock, R. A. (2010) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00512.x · Cited by 798
Governance and Complexity—Emerging Issues for Governance Theory
DUIT, A., & GALAZ, V. (2008) · Governance · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00402.x · Cited by 640
Metadata
- Authors
- Peters, D. P. C., Pielke, R. A., Bestelmeyer, B. T., Allen, C. D., Munson-McGee, S., & Havstad, K. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-10-06
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 15130-15135
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1967021755
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 11.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-scale interactions, nonlinearities, and forecasting catastrophic events. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0403822101
- The paper
- Peters, D. P. C., Pielke, R. A., Bestelmeyer, B. T., Allen, C. D., Munson-McGee, S., & Havstad, K. M. (2004). Cross-scale interactions, nonlinearities, and forecasting catastrophic events. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403822101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.