The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence for landscape-level, pollen-mediated gene flow from genetically modified creeping bentgrass with CP4 EPSPS as a marker
Open accessAbstract
Sampling methods and results of a gene flow study are described that will be of interest to plant scientists, evolutionary biologists, ecologists, and stakeholders assessing the environmental safety of transgenic crops. This study documents gene flow on a landscape level from creeping bentgrass ( Agrostis stolonifera L.), one of the first wind-pollinated, perennial, and highly outcrossing transgenic crops being developed for commercial use. Most of the gene flow occurred within 2 km in the direction of prevailing winds. The maximal gene flow distances observed were 21 km and 14 km in sentinel and resident plants, respectively, that were located in primarily nonagronomic habitats. The selectable marker used in these studies was the CP4 EPSPS gene derived from Agrobacterium spp. strain CP4 that encodes 5-enol-pyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase and confers resistance to glyphosate herbicide. Evidence for gene flow to 75 of 138 sentinel plants of A. stolonifera and to 29 of 69 resident Agrostis plants was based on seedling progeny survival after spraying with glyphosate in greenhouse assays and positive TraitChek, PCR, and sequencing results. Additional studies are needed to determine whether introgression will occur and whether it will affect the ecological fitness of progeny or the structure of plant communities in which transgenic progeny may become established.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grime, J. P. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283244 · Cited by 5,754
Cited by
Glyphosate: a once‐in‐a‐century herbicide
Duke, S. O., & Powles, S. B. (2008) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.1518 · Cited by 1,749
The evolutionary origins of pesticide resistance
Hawkins, N. J., Bass, C., Dixon, A., & Neve, P. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12440 · Cited by 836
Genetically modified crops: current status and future prospects
Kumar, K., Gambhir, G., Dass, A., Tripathi, A. K., Singh, A., Jha, A. K., Yadava, P., Choudhary, M., & Rakshit, S. (2020) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-020-03372-8 · Cited by 528
The Current Status and Environmental Impacts of Glyphosate‐Resistant Crops: A Review
Cerdeira, A. L., & Duke, S. O. (2006) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2005.0378 · Cited by 393
Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants
Andow, D. A., & Zwahlen, C. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00846.x · Cited by 327
Metadata
- Authors
- Watrud, L. S., Lee, E. H., Fairbrother, A., Burdick, C., Reichman, J. R., Bollman, M., Storm, M., King, G., & Van de Water, P. K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2004-09-24
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 14533-14538
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2135209522
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for landscape-level, pollen-mediated gene flow from genetically modified creeping bentgrass with CP4 EPSPS as a marker. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0405154101
- The paper
- Watrud, L. S., Lee, E. H., Fairbrother, A., Burdick, C., Reichman, J. R., Bollman, M., Storm, M., King, G., & Van de Water, P. K. (2004). Evidence for landscape-level, pollen-mediated gene flow from genetically modified creeping bentgrass with CP4 EPSPS as a marker. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405154101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.