The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The olfactory receptor gene repertoire in primates and mouse: Evidence for reduction of the functional fraction in primates
Open accessAbstract
Olfactory receptors (ORs) located in the cell membrane of olfactory sensory neurons of the nasal epithelium are responsible for odor detection by binding specific odorant ligands. Primates are thought to have a reduced sense of smell (microsmatic) with respect to other mammals such as dogs or rodents. We have previously demonstrated that over 70% of the human OR genes have become nonfunctional pseudogenes, leading us to hypothesize that the reduced sense of smell could correlate with the loss of functional genes. To extend these results, we sampled the OR gene repertoire of 10 primate species, from prosimian lemur to human, in addition to mouse. About 221 previously unidentified primate sequences and 33 mouse sequences were analyzed. These sequences encode ORs distributed in seven families and 56 subfamilies. Analysis showed a high fraction (≈50% on average) of pseudogenes in hominoids. In contrast, only ≈27% of OR genes are pseudogenes in Old World monkeys, and New World monkeys are almost free of pseudogenes. The prosimian branch seems to have evolved differently from the other primates and has ≈37% pseudogene content. No pseudogenes were found in mouse. With the exception of New World monkeys, we demonstrate that primates have a high fraction of OR pseudogenes compared with mouse. We hypothesize that under relaxed selective constraints, primates would have progressively accumulated pseudogenes with the highest level seen in hominoids. The fraction of pseudogenes in the OR gene repertoire could parallel the evolution of the olfactory sensory function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition
Buck, L., & Axel, R. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90418-x · Cited by 4,987
Cited by
Evolution by gene duplication: An update
Zhang, J. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00033-8 · Cited by 2,201
Plant Volatile Compounds: Sensory Cues for Health and Nutritional Value?
Goff, S. A., & Klee, H. J. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1112614 · Cited by 710
Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century myth
McGann, J. P. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam7263 · Cited by 500
Kishida, T., Kubota, S., Shirayama, Y., & Fukami, H. (2007) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0191 · Cited by 141
Semin (2017) · doi:10.1177/1745691616676599 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Rouquier, S., Blancher, A., & Giorgi, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-03-07
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2870-2874
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2084629681
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The olfactory receptor gene repertoire in primates and mouse: Evidence for reduction of the functional fraction in primates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.040580197
- The paper
- Rouquier, S., Blancher, A., & Giorgi, D. (2000). The olfactory receptor gene repertoire in primates and mouse: Evidence for reduction of the functional fraction in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.040580197
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.