Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnostic tool for the identification of MLL rearrangements including unknown partner genes

Open access
Meyer, Claus, Schneider, Bjoern, Reichel, Martin, Angermueller, Sieglinde, Strehl, Sabine, Schnittger, Susanne, Schoch, Claudia, Jansen, Mieke W. J. C., van Dongen, Jacques J., Pieters, Rob, Haas, Oskar A., Dingermann, Theo, Klingebiel, Thomas, Marschalek, Rolf·2005·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Approximately 50 different chromosomal translocations of the human MLL gene are currently known and associated with high-risk acute leukemia. The large number of different MLL translocation partner genes makes a precise diagnosis a demanding task. After their cytogenetic identification, only the most common MLL translocations are investigated by RT-PCR analyses, whereas infrequent or unknown MLL translocations are excluded from further analyses. Therefore, we aimed at establishing a method that enables the detection of any MLL rearrangement by using genomic DNA isolated from patient biopsy material. This goal was achieved by establishing a universal long-distance inverse-PCR approach that allows the identification of any kind of MLL rearrangement if located within the breakpoint cluster region. This method was applied to biopsy material derived from 40 leukemia patients known to carry MLL abnormalities. Thirty-six patients carried known MLL fusions (34 with der(11) and 2 with reciprocal alleles), whereas 3 patients were found to carry novel MLL fusions to ACACA, SELB , and SMAP1 , respectively. One patient carried a genomic fusion between MLL and TIRAP , resulting from an interstitial deletion. Because of this interstitial deletion, portions of the MLL and TIRAP genes were deleted, together with 123 genes located within the 13-Mbp interval between both chromosomal loci. Therefore, this previously undescribed diagnostic tool has been proven successful for analyzing any MLL rearrangement including previously unrecognized partner genes. Furthermore, the determined patient-specific fusion sequences are useful for minimal residual disease monitoring of MLL associated acute leukemias.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0406994102

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Meyer, C., Schneider, B., Reichel, M., Angermueller, S., Strehl, S., Schnittger, S., Schoch, C., Jansen, M. W. J. C., van Dongen, J. J., Pieters, R., Haas, O. A., Dingermann, T., Klingebiel, T., & Marschalek, R.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-12-30
Volume
102
Issue
2
Pages
449-454
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1982541235
Cited by
180
References
1
FWCI
8.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic tool for the identification of MLL rearrangements including unknown partner genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0406994102
The paper
Meyer, C., Schneider, B., Reichel, M., Angermueller, S., Strehl, S., Schnittger, S., Schoch, C., Jansen, M. W. J. C., van Dongen, J. J., Pieters, R., Haas, O. A., Dingermann, T., Klingebiel, T., & Marschalek, R. (2005). Diagnostic tool for the identification of MLL rearrangements including unknown partner genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406994102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.