Cited by 104Liver physiology and pathologyCongenital heart defects researchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

c-Myc regulates cell size and ploidy but is not essential for postnatal proliferation in liver

Open access

Abstract

The c-Myc protein is a transcription factor implicated in the regulation of multiple biological processes, including cell proliferation, cell growth, and apoptosis. In vivo overexpression of c-myc is linked to tumor development in a number of mouse models. Here, we show that perinatal inactivation of c-Myc in liver causes disorganized organ architecture, decreased hepatocyte size, and cell ploidy. Furthermore, c-Myc appears to have distinct roles in proliferation in liver. Thus, postnatal hepatocyte proliferation does not require c-Myc, whereas it is necessary for liver regeneration in adult mice. These results show novel physiological functions of c-myc in liver development and hepatocyte proliferation and growth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0409260102

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 49 references

4 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Morgenbesser, S. D. & DePinho, R. A. (1994) Semin. Cancer Biol. 5, 21-36.8186385
  2. Gu, J. R., Hu, L. F., Cheng, Y. C. & Wan, D. F. (1986) J. Cell Physiol. Suppl. 4, 13-20.2427530
  3. Yaswen, P., Goyette, M., Shank, P. R. & Fausto, N. (1985) Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 780-786.2581126
  4. Thompson, N. L., Mead, J. E., Braun, L., Goyette, M., Shank, P. R. & Fausto, N. (1986) Cancer Res. 46, 3111-3117.3516391
  5. Askew, D. S., Ashmun, R. A., Simmons, B. C. & Cleveland, J. L. (1991) Oncogene 6, 1915-1922.1923514
  6. Sandgren, E. P., Quaife, C. J., Pinkert, C. A., Palmiter, R. D. & Brinster, R. L. (1989) Oncogene 4, 715-724.2543942
  7. Alboran, I. M., Baena, E. & Martinez, A. C. (2004) Cell Death Differ. 11, 690.
  8. Maines, J. Z., Stevens, L. M., Tong, X. & Stein, D. (2004) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 131, 775-786.
  9. Pierce, S. B., Yost, C., Britton, J. S., Loo, L. W., Flynn, E. M., Edgar, B. A. & Eisenman, R. N. (2004) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 131, 2317-2327.
  10. 10.1128/mcb.4.8.1493-1498.1984 · DOI
  11. Fausto, N., Mead, J. E., Braun, L., Thompson, N. L., Panzica, M., Goyette, M., Bell, G. I. & Shank, P. R. (1986) Symp. Fundam. Cancer Res. 39, 69-86.3321311
  12. Guo, Q. M., Malek, R. L., Kim, S., Chiao, C., He, M., Ruffy, M., Sanka, K., Lee, N. H., Dang, C. V. & Liu, E. T. (2000) Cancer Res. 60, 5922-5928.11085504

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–104 of 104

Metadata

Authors
Baena, E., Gandarillas, A., Vallespinós, M., Zanet, J., Bachs, O., Redondo, C., Fabregat, I., Martinez-A., C., & de Alborán, I. M.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Department of Immunology and Oncology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología/Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, E-28049 Madrid, Spain; Institut Universitaire de Recherche Clinique, Laboratoire de Dermatologie Moléculaire Unité Propre de Recherche de l'Enseignement Superieur EA3754, F-34093 Montpellier, France; Departament de Biologia Cellular i Anatomia Patologica, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer, Facultat de Medicina,...
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-04-27
Volume
102
Issue
20
Pages
7286-7291
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2046528425
Cited by
104
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
c-Myc, hepatocyte proliferation, liver regeneration, hepatocyte size, cell ploidy, liver development, cell growth, transcription factors
MeSH terms
Animals, Bromodeoxyuridine, Fluoresceins, Immunohistochemistry, Liver, Ploidies, Poly I-C, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc, DNA Primers, Mice, Knockout, Hepatocytes, Cell Size, Cell Proliferation, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review