The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical review of host specificity and its coevolutionary implications in the fig/fig-wasp mutualism
Open accessAbstract
Figs (Ficus spp., Moraceae) and their pollinating wasps (Agaonidae, Chalcidoidea) constitute perhaps the most tightly integrated pollination mutualism that is known. Figs are characterized by extraordinarily high global and local species diversity. It has been proposed that the diversification of this mutualism has occurred through strict-sense coadaptation and cospeciation between pairs of fig and wasp species that are associated in highly specific one-to-one relationships. However, existing studies cast doubt on the generality of this proposition. Here, we review our current knowledge of the evolutionary history of the fig/fig-wasp mutualism. We critically examine the idea that codivergence between figs and their pollinators has been dominated by strict-sense cospeciation. We present phylogenetic and population genetic data from neotropical fig and fig wasp species that suggest that a more accurate model for diversification in this mutualism is that of groups of genetically well defined wasp species coevolving with genetically less well defined (frequently hybridizing) groups of figs. Last, we use our results to assess previously proposed hypotheses on models of speciation in this mutualism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Evolutionary Genetics
Nei, M. (1987) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/nei-92038 · Cited by 15,271
Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.
Tajima, F. (1989) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/123.3.585 · Cited by 13,941
PAUP^* : Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods) 4.0b8
Swofford, D. L. (2001) · Cited by 12,789
Simon, C., Frati, F., Beckenbach, A., Crespi, B., Liu, H., & Flook, P. (1994) · Annals of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1093/aesa/87.6.651 · Cited by 6,097
PAUP * [Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods)]
Cummings, M. P. (2004) · Dictionary of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology · doi:10.1002/0471650129.dob0522 · Cited by 5,215
Multiple Comparisons of Log-Likelihoods with Applications to Phylogenetic Inference
Shimodaira, H., & Hasegawa, M. (1999) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026201 · Cited by 4,237
Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.
Fu, Y. X., & Li, W. H. (1993) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/133.3.693 · Cited by 4,034
On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination
Watterson, G. A. (1975) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9 · Cited by 3,915
THE MAJOR TRANSITIONS OF EVOLUTION
Leigh, E. G. (1995) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb04464.x · Cited by 3,410
EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIP OF DNA SEQUENCES IN FINITE POPULATIONS
Tajima, F. (1983) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/105.2.437 · Cited by 3,092
Cited by
Ecological opportunity and the origin of adaptive radiations
YODER, J. B., CLANCEY, E., DES ROCHES, S., EASTMAN, J. M., GENTRY, L., GODSOE, W., HAGEY, T. J., JOCHIMSEN, D., OSWALD, B. P., ROBERTSON, J., et al. (2010) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02029.x · Cited by 731
The evolution of plant–insect mutualisms
Bronstein, J. L., Alarcón, R., & Geber, M. (2006) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01864.x · Cited by 538
BIOTIC INTERACTIONS AND MACROEVOLUTION: EXTENSIONS AND MISMATCHES ACROSS SCALES AND LEVELS
Jablonski, D. (2008) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00317.x · Cited by 294
The Ribosome Challenge to the RNA World
Bowman, J. C., Hud, N. V., & Williams, L. D. (2015) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/s00239-015-9669-9 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Machado, C. A., Robbins, N., Gilbert, M. T. P., & Herre, E. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-04-25
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- suppl_1
- Pages
- 6558-6565
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2133864017
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 12.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical review of host specificity and its coevolutionary implications in the fig/fig-wasp mutualism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0501840102
- The paper
- Machado, C. A., Robbins, N., Gilbert, M. T. P., & Herre, E. A. (2005). Critical review of host specificity and its coevolutionary implications in the fig/fig-wasp mutualism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501840102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.