The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Background gamma rhythmicity and attention in cortical local circuits: A computational study
Open accessAbstract
We describe a simple computational model, based on generic features of cortical local circuits, that links cholinergic neuromodulation, gamma rhythmicity, and attentional selection. We propose that cholinergic modulation, by reducing adaptation currents in principal cells, induces a transition from asynchronous spontaneous activity to a “background” gamma rhythm (resembling the persistent gamma rhythms evoked in vitro by cholinergic agonists) in which individual principal cells participate infrequently and irregularly. We suggest that such rhythms accompany states of preparatory attention or vigilance and report simulations demonstrating that their presence can amplify stimulus-specific responses and enhance stimulus competition within a local circuit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computational modelling of visual attention
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35058500 · Cited by 4,733
Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing
Engel, A. K., Fries, P., & Singer, W. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35094565 · Cited by 3,454
Whittington, M. A., Traub, R. D., & Jefferys, J. G. R. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/373612a0 · Cited by 1,613
Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4
Reynolds, J. H., Chelazzi, L., & Desimone, R. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-05-01736.1999 · Cited by 1,236
Cholinergic induction of network oscillations at 40 Hz in the hippocampus in vitro
Fisahn, A., Pike, F. G., Buhl, E. H., & Paulsen, O. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/28179 · Cited by 884
Neuromodulation: acetylcholine and memory consolidation
Hasselmo, M. E. (1999) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01365-0 · Cited by 809
Neuronal Networks of the Hippocampus
Traub, R. D., & Miles, R. (1991) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511895401 · Cited by 802
Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex
Desimone, R. (1998) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0280 · Cited by 696
Modulation of the input/output function of rat piriform cortex pyramidal cells
Barkai, E., & Hasselmo, M. E. (1994) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1994.72.2.644 · Cited by 158
Cited by
Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses
Cardin, J. A., Carlén, M., Meletis, K., Knoblich, U., Zhang, F., Deisseroth, K., Tsai, L.-H., & Moore, C. I. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08002 · Cited by 2,603
Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation
Fries, P. (2009) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135603 · Cited by 1,713
Attention, uncertainty, and free-energy
Feldman, H., & Friston, K. J. (2010) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00215 · Cited by 1,365
Fries, P., Nikolić, D., & Singer, W. (2007) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2007.05.005 · Cited by 1,044
Adaptive reconfiguration of fractal small-world human brain functional networks
Bassett, D. S., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Achard, S., Duke, T., & Bullmore, E. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0606005103 · Cited by 814
Metadata
- Authors
- Börgers, C., Epstein, S., & Kopell, N. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-05-03
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 7002-7007
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2133125918
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 6.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
