Cited by 158Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Modulation of the input/output function of rat piriform cortex pyramidal cells

Barkai, E., Hasselmo, M. E.·1994·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. In transverse brain slice preparations of rat piriform cortex, we characterized the repetitive firing properties of layer II pyramidal cells in control conditions (n = 78) and during perfusion of the cholinergic agonist carbachol (n = 26), with the ultimate goal of developing realistic computational simulations of the cholinergic modulation of the input/output function of these neurons. The response of neurons to prolonged (1 s) intracellular current injections was examined at a full range of current injection amplitudes, providing three-dimensional plots of firing frequency versus current amplitude versus time. 2. All neurons showed adaptation in response to intracellular current injection, with repetitive generation of action potentials at frequencies that were highest at the onset of the pulse and that decreased considerably thereafter. Substantial differences were observed between cells with regard to their rates of adaptation and the maximal number of action potentials they could generate during the current pulse. 3. The adaptation characteristics of each neuron were quantified by plotting the number of action potentials generated in 1 s as a function of the normalized current injection amplitude and measuring the area beneath this plot of the number of spikes versus current injection amplitude (S-I plot). This value was termed S-I value and allowed neurons to be plotted on a continuum including neurons showing strong adaptation (S-I value < 8.0) and neurons showing weak adaptation (S-I value > 8.0). The group showing weak adaptation contained 36% of the cells in control solution and 93.8% of the cells in 20 microM carbachol. 4. Neurons showing strong adaptation did not differ significantly from neurons showing weak adaptation in control conditions in measurements of resting potential, input resistance, threshold, and spike amplitude. Only a small difference was found in frequencies of firing measured soon after pulse onset (after 100 ms). This implies that differences in S-I values are primarily due to different rates of adaptation in later parts of the response. 5. Perfusion with solution containing the cholinergic agonist carbachol (2–100 microM) or 0 Ca2+ and 200 microM cadmium resulted in a substantial increase in the S-I values of neurons showing strong adaptation but had only a small effect on their initial firing rates. The effect on weakly adapting cells was smaller. In the presence of 20 microM carbachol, neurons showed a distribution shifted predominantly toward weak adaptation (n = 26).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1994.72.2.644

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The spiking response of cortical neurons to sensory input is enhanced by muscarinic receptors causing a decrease in potassium conductances including resting conductances, the M current, and the calcium-dependent potassium current.

    “The spiking response of cortical neurons to sensory input is further enhanced by muscarinic receptors causing a decrease in potassium conductances including resting conductances (Krnjevik et al., 1971; Cole and Nicoll, 1984; Barkai and Hasselmo, 1994; Gulledge et al., 2009) the M current (Madison et al., 1987) and the calcium-dependent potassium current (Madison and Nicoll, 1984; Schwindt et al.,”

    From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as Barkai and Hasselmo, 1994

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barkai, E., & Hasselmo, M. E.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1994-08-01
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
644-658
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W66960383
Cited by
158
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
piriform cortex, pyramidal neurons, cholinergic modulation, carbachol, neural adaptation, input-output function, repetitive firing, action potential frequency, current injection, layer II
MeSH terms
Acetylcholine, Afferent Pathways, Animals, Association Learning, Cerebral Cortex, Cholinergic Fibers, Electric Stimulation, Female, Membrane Potentials, Nerve Net, Neural Inhibition, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Olfactory Pathways, Mental Recall, Neural Networks, Computer, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Pyramidal Cells, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review