Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 969

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Central memory self/tumor-reactive CD8 + T cells confer superior antitumor immunity compared with effector memory T cells

Open access
Klebanoff, Christopher A., Gattinoni, Luca, Torabi-Parizi, Parizad, Kerstann, Keith, Cardones, Adela R., Finkelstein, Steven E., Palmer, Douglas C., Antony, Paul A., Hwang, Sam T., Rosenberg, Steven A., Waldmann, Thomas A., Restifo, Nicholas P.·2005·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Central memory CD8 + T cells (T CM ) and effector memory CD8 + T cells (T EM ) are found in humans and mice; however, their relative contributions to host immunity have only recently been examined in vivo . Further, the ability of T CM to treat an established tumor or infection has yet to be evaluated. To address the therapeutic potential of different tumor-reactive CD8 + T cell memory subsets, we used an established model for the in vitro generation of T CM and T EM by using IL-15 and IL-2, respectively. Adoptively transferred T CM exhibited a potent in vivo recall response when combined with tumor-antigen vaccination and exogenous IL-2, leading to the eradication of large established tumors. By contrast, T EM were far less effective on a per-cell basis. Microarray analysis revealed that the signature of highly in vivo effective antitumor T cells included the overexpression of genes responsible for trafficking to secondary lymphoid tissues. This gene expression profile correctly predicted the in vitro and in vivo lymphoid-homing attributes of tumor-reactive T cells. Furthermore, we found that homing to secondary lymphoid tissue is required for optimal tumor treatment. Our findings indicated that highly in vivo effective antitumor T cells were those that initially targeted secondary lymphoid tissue, rather than tumor sites, as had previously been postulated. Thus, tumor-reactive CD8 + T cell populations with the phenotypic and functional attributes of T CM may be superior to T EM /effector T cells for adoptive immunotherapies using concomitant tumor-antigen vaccination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0503726102

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 969

Metadata

Authors
Klebanoff, C. A., Gattinoni, L., Torabi-Parizi, P., Kerstann, K., Cardones, A. R., Finkelstein, S. E., Palmer, D. C., Antony, P. A., Hwang, S. T., Rosenberg, S. A., Waldmann, T. A., & Restifo, N. P.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-06-24
Volume
102
Issue
27
Pages
9571-9576
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2099736081
Cited by
969
References
4
FWCI
11.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Central memory self/tumor-reactive CD8 + T cells confer superior antitumor immunity compared with effector memory T cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0503726102
The paper
Klebanoff, C. A., Gattinoni, L., Torabi-Parizi, P., Kerstann, K., Cardones, A. R., Finkelstein, S. E., Palmer, D. C., Antony, P. A., Hwang, S. T., Rosenberg, S. A., Waldmann, T. A., & Restifo, N. P. (2005). Central memory self/tumor-reactive CD8 + T cells confer superior antitumor immunity compared with effector memory T cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503726102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.