Cited by 551Advanced Chemical Physics StudiesQuantum many-body systemsPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism

Nearsightedness of electronic matter

Open access
Prodan, E., Kohn, W.·2005·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

In an earlier paper, W. Kohn had qualitatively introduced the concept of “nearsightedness” of electrons in many-atom systems. It can be viewed as underlying such important ideas as Pauling's “chemical bond,” “transferability,” and Yang's computational principle of “divide and conquer.” It describes the fact that, for fixed chemical potential, local electronic properties, such as the density n ( r ), depend significantly on the effective external potential only at nearby points. Changes of that potential, no matter how large , beyond a distance R have limited effects on local electronic properties, which rapidly tend to zero as a function of R. In the present paper, the concept is first sharpened for representative models of uncharged fermions moving in external potentials, and then the effects of electron–electron interactions and of perturbing external charges are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0505436102

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of excited-state calculations are based on many-body perturbation theory (e.g., G0W0, self-consistent GW, BSE, DMFT) and are performed on top of a DFT calculation, which provides the starting point.

    “The majority of excited-states calculations are based on many-body perturbation theory (MBPT), e.g. G 0 W 0 and self-consistent GW [31-33], the Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) [34], or dynamical mean field theory (DMFT) [35], and are performed on-top of a DFT calculation, which provides the starting point for both self-consistent and one-shot approaches.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prodan, E., & Kohn, W.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-08-08
Volume
102
Issue
33
Pages
11635-11638
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2142501550
Cited by
551
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Bulletin of the American Physical Society
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Keywords
electron density, chemical bonding, transferability, electron-electron interaction, external potential, local electronic properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review