The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the spatiotemporal evolution of neuronal activation with single-trial event-related potentials and functional MRI
Open accessAbstract
The brain acts as an integrated information processing system, which methods in cognitive neuroscience have so far depicted in a fragmented fashion. Here, we propose a simple and robust way to integrate functional MRI (fMRI) with single trial event-related potentials (ERP) to provide a more complete spatiotemporal characterization of evoked responses in the human brain. The idea behind the approach is to find brain regions whose fMRI responses can be predicted by paradigm-induced amplitude modulations of simultaneously acquired single trial ERPs. The method was used to study a variant of a two-stimulus auditory target detection (odd-ball) paradigm that manipulated predictability through alternations of stimulus sequences with random or regular target-to-target intervals. In addition to electrophysiologic and hemodynamic evoked responses to auditory targets per se , single-trial modulations were expressed during the latencies of the P2 (170-ms), N2 (200-ms), and P3 (320-ms) components and predicted spatially separated fMRI activation patterns. These spatiotemporal matches, i.e., the prediction of hemodynamic activation by time-variant information from single trial ERPs, permit inferences about regional responses using fMRI with the temporal resolution provided by electrophysiology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, for event-like tasks or stimuli, EEG features may also be extracted from temporal variations in single-trial potentials, and their correlations with fMRI reveal rich temporal dynamics of information processing in task-evoked neural networks (176, 177).”
From Electrophysiological source imaging: A noninvasive window to brain dynamics (2018) · cites this paper as [176]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190
Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35084005 · Cited by 6,551
A theory of cortical responses.
Friston, K. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622 · Cited by 4,578
Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies
Cabeza, R., & Nyberg, L. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/08989290051137585 · Cited by 3,598
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00058027 · Cited by 3,585
Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. (1987) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00311.x · Cited by 3,321
Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty
Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J., & John, E. R. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.150.3700.1187 · Cited by 3,061
Perception and the Conditioned Reflex
Hay, J. C., & Sokolov, Y. N. (1966) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1420734 · Cited by 2,123
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Spencer K. M. (2005) in Event Related Potentials A Methods Handbook ed. Handy T. C. (MIT Press Cambridge MA) pp. 209-228.
- Halgren E. & Marinkovic K. (1995) in Recent Advances in Event-Related Brain Potential Research eds. Ogura C. Koga Y. & Shimokochi M. (Elsevier Amsterdam) pp. 1072-1084.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b
Polich, J. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019 · Cited by 7,919
Lloyd‐Fox, S., Blasi, A., & Elwell, C. E. (2009) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.07.008 · Cited by 902
Extracting information from neuronal populations: information theory and decoding approaches
Quiroga, R. Q., & Panzeri, S. (2009) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2578 · Cited by 827
Self-citationRemoval of Movement Artifact From High-Density EEG Recorded During Walking and Running
Gwin, J. T., Gramann, K., Makeig, S., & Ferris, D. P. (2010) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00105.2010 · Cited by 484
Prediction of human errors by maladaptive changes in event-related brain networks
Eichele, T., Debener, S., Calhoun, V. D., Specht, K., Engel, A. K., Hugdahl, K., von Cramon, D. Y., & Ullsperger, M. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0708965105 · Cited by 472
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Eichele, T., Specht, K., Moosmann, M., Jongsma, M. L. A., Quiroga, R. Q., Nordby, H., & Hugdahl, K.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-11-28
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 17798-17803
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC1295592
- OpenAlex
- W2130038497
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Norges Forskningsråd
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- single-trial event-related potentials, functional MRI, spatiotemporal integration, evoked potentials, oddball paradigm, auditory target detection, predictability, P2 component, N2 component, P300
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neurons, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
