The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conservation of spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal signaling between mouse and rat
Open accessAbstract
Self-renewal of spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) is the foundation for maintenance of spermatogenesis throughout life in males and for continuation of a species. The molecular mechanism underlying stem cell self-renewal is a fundamental question in stem cell biology. Recently, we identified growth factors necessary for self-renewal of mouse SSCs and established a serum-free culture system for their proliferation in vitro . To determine whether the stimulatory signals for SSC replication are conserved among different species, we extended the culture system to rat SSCs. Initially, a method to assess in vitro expansion of SSCs was developed by using flow cytometric analysis, and, subsequently, we found that a combination of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, soluble glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor-family receptor α-1 and basic fibroblast growth factor supports proliferation of rat SSCs. When cultured with the three factors, stem cells proliferated continuously for >7 months, and transplantation of the cultured SSCs to recipient rats generated donor stem cell-derived progeny, demonstrating that the cultured stem cells are normal. The growth factor requirement for replication of rat SSCs is identical to that of mouse; therefore, the signaling factors for SSC self-renewal are conserved in these two species. Because SSCs from many mammals, including human, can replicate in mouse seminiferous tubules after transplantation, the growth factors required for SSC self-renewal may be conserved among many different species. Furthermore, development of a long-term culture system for rat SSCs has established a foundation for germ-line modification of the rat by gene targeting technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blanpain, C., Lowry, W. E., Geoghegan, A., Polak, L., & Fuchs, E. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.08.012 · Cited by 1,428
Cited by
The Germline Stem Cell Niche Unit in Mammalian Testes
Oatley, J. M., & Brinster, R. L. (2012) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00025.2011 · Cited by 513
Self-citationWu, Y., Zhou, H., Fan, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, M., Wang, Y., Xie, Z., Bai, M., Yin, Q., Liang, D., et al. (2015) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2014.160 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryu, B.-Y., Kubota, H., Avarbock, M. R., & Brinster, R. L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-09-23
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 14302-14307
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2045887697
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conservation of spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal signaling between mouse and rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0506970102
- The paper
- Ryu, B.-Y., Kubota, H., Avarbock, M. R., & Brinster, R. L. (2005). Conservation of spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal signaling between mouse and rat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506970102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.