The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multisite protein phosphorylation makes a good threshold but can be a poor switch
Open accessAbstract
Phosphorylation and dephosphorylation play a fundamental role in eukaryotic signaling. Some 30% of proteins are phosphorylated at any time, many on multiple sites, raising the question of how the cellular phosphorylation state is regulated. Previous work for one and two phosphorylation sites has revealed mechanisms, such as distributive phosphorylation, for switch-like regulation of maximally phosphorylated phosphoforms. These insights have led to the influential view that more phosphorylation sites leads to steeper switching, as proposed for substrates like cyclin E and the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor Sic1. An analytical study of the ordered distributive case reveals a more complex story. Multisite phosphorylation creates an efficient threshold: The proportion of maximally phosphorylated substrate is maintained close to 0 when the ratio of kinase to phosphatase activity lies below a suitable threshold, and this threshold increases with increasing numbers of sites, n . However, above the threshold, the response may not always abruptly switch between 0 and 1, as would be the case for an efficient switch, but may increase in a gradual manner, which becomes more hyperbolic with increasing n . Abrupt switching cannot be attributed merely to n being large. We point out that conventional measures of ultrasensitivity must be modified to discriminate between thresholding and switching; we discuss additional factors that influence switching efficiency and suggest new directions for experimental investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ultrasensitivity in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade.
Huang, C. Y., & Ferrell, J. E. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.19.10078 · Cited by 1,186
Why do protein kinase cascades have more than one level?
Brown, G. C., Hoek, J. B., & Kholodenko, B. N. (1997) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(97)82216-5 · Cited by 88
Cited by
Design principles of biochemical oscillators
Novák, B., & Tyson, J. J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2530 · Cited by 1,137
Prabakaran, S., Lippens, G., Steen, H., & Gunawardena, J. (2012) · WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1002/wsbm.1185 · Cited by 335
Self-citationPolyelectrostatic interactions of disordered ligands suggest a physical basis for ultrasensitivity
Borg, M., Mittag, T., Pawson, T., Tyers, M., Forman-Kay, J. D., & Chan, H. S. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702580104 · Cited by 245
Paul, D., & Radde, N. (2018) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.07.012 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Gunawardena, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-09-29
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 14617-14622
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2126464248
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.