The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A regulator of nutritional copper signaling in Chlamydomonas is an SBP domain protein that recognizes the GTAC core of copper response element
Open accessAbstract
The CRR1 (Copper Response Regulator) locus, required for both activating and repressing target genes of a copper- and hypoxia-sensing pathway in Chlamydomonas , encodes a 1,232-residue candidate transcription factor with a plant-specific DNA-binding domain named SBP, ankyrin repeats, and a C-terminal Cys-rich region, with similarity to a Drosophila metallothionein. The recombinant SBP domain of Crr1 shows zinc-dependent binding to functionally defined copper-response elements associated with the CYC6 and CPX1 promoters that contain a critical GTAC core sequence. Competition experiments indicate equivalent selectivity for copper-response elements from either promoter and 10-fold greater selectivity for the wild-type sequence vs. a sequence carrying a single mutation in the GTAC core. The SBP domain of Chlamydomonas Crr1 binds also to a related GTAC-containing sequence in the Arabidopsis AP1 promoter that is the binding site of a defining member of the SBP family of DNA-binding proteins. Chlamydomonas Crr1 is most similar to a subset of the Arabidopsis SBP domain proteins, which include SPL1, SPL7, and SPL12. The abundance of the CRR1 mRNA is only marginally copper-responsive, and although two mRNAs that differ with respect to splicing of the first intron are detected, there is no indication that the splicing event is regulated by metal nutrition or hypoxia. It is likely that the dramatic copper-responsive action of Crr1 occurs at the level of the polypeptide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gou, J.-Y., Felippes, F. F., Liu, C.-J., Weigel, D., & Wang, J.-W. (2011) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.111.084525 · Cited by 953
Copper in plants: acquisition, transport and interactions
Yruela, I. (2009) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp08288 · Cited by 912
Trace metal metabolism in plants
Andresen, E., Peiter, E., & Küpper, H. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erx465 · Cited by 431
Wang, H., & Wang, H. (2015) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2015.01.008 · Cited by 356
Bernal, M., Casero, D., Singh, V., Wilson, G. T., Grande, A., Yang, H., Dodani, S. C., Pellegrini, M., Huijser, P., Connolly, E. L., et al. (2012) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.111.090431 · Cited by 323
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kropat, J., Tottey, S., Birkenbihl, R. P., Depège, N., Huijser, P., & Merchant, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-12-13
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 51
- Pages
- 18730-18735
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2091001899
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A regulator of nutritional copper signaling in Chlamydomonas is an SBP domain protein that recognizes the GTAC core of copper response element. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0507693102
- The paper
- Kropat, J., Tottey, S., Birkenbihl, R. P., Depège, N., Huijser, P., & Merchant, S. (2005). A regulator of nutritional copper signaling in Chlamydomonas is an SBP domain protein that recognizes the GTAC core of copper response element. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507693102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.