The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Asian origin for a 10,000-year-old domesticated plant in the Americas
Open accessAbstract
New genetic and archaeological approaches have substantially improved our understanding of the transition to agriculture, a major turning point in human history that began 10,000–5,000 years ago with the independent domestication of plants and animals in eight world regions. In the Americas, however, understanding the initial domestication of New World species has long been complicated by the early presence of an African enigma, the bottle gourd ( Lagenaria siceraria ). Indigenous to Africa, it reached East Asia by 9,000–8,000 before present (B.P.) and had a broad New World distribution by 8,000 B.P. Here we integrate genetic and archaeological approaches to address a set of long-standing core questions regarding the introduction of the bottle gourd into the Americas. Did it reach the New World directly from Africa or through Asia? Was it transported by humans or ocean currents? Was it wild or domesticated upon arrival? Fruit rind thickness values and accelerator mass spectrometer radiocarbon dating of archaeological specimens indicate that the bottle gourd was present in the Americas as a domesticated plant by 10,000 B.P., placing it among the earliest domesticates in the New World. Ancient DNA sequence analysis of archaeological bottle gourd specimens and comparison with modern Asian and African landraces identify Asia as the source of its introduction. We suggest that the bottle gourd and the dog, two “utility” species, were domesticated long before any food crops or livestock species, and that both were brought to the Americas by Paleoindian populations as they colonized the New World.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Documenting domestication: The intersection of genetics and archaeology
Zeder, M. A., Emshwiller, E., Smith, B. D., & Bradley, D. G. (2006) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2006.01.007 · Cited by 447
Self-citationPiperno, D. R. (2011) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/659998 · Cited by 427
Roullier, C., Benoit, L., McKey, D. B., & Lebot, V. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211049110 · Cited by 292
Preceramic Adoption of Peanut, Squash, and Cotton in Northern Peru
Dillehay, T. D., Rossen, J., Andres, T. C., & Williams, D. E. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1141395 · Cited by 273
Fuller, D. Q., Willcox, G., & Allaby, R. G. (2011) · World Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00438243.2011.624747 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Erickson, D. L., Smith, B. D., Clarke, A. C., Sandweiss, D. H., & Tuross, N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-12-13
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 51
- Pages
- 18315-18320
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1996439449
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Asian origin for a 10,000-year-old domesticated plant in the Americas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0509279102
- The paper
- Erickson, D. L., Smith, B. D., Clarke, A. C., Sandweiss, D. H., & Tuross, N. (2005). An Asian origin for a 10,000-year-old domesticated plant in the Americas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0509279102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.