CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 427

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Origins of Plant Cultivation and Domestication in the New World Tropics: Patterns, Process, and New Developments

Piperno, Dolores R.·2011·Current Anthropology
DOI 10.1086/659998
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The New World tropical forest is now considered to be an early and independent cradle of agriculture. As in other areas of the world, our understanding of this issue has been significantly advanced by a steady stream of archaeobotanical, paleoecological, and molecular/genetic data. Also importantly, a renewed focus on formulating testable theories and explanations for the transition from foraging to food production has led to applications from subdisciplines of ecology, economy, and evolution not previously applied to agricultural origins. Most recently, the integration of formerly separated disciplines, such as developmental and evolutionary biology, is causing reconsiderations of how novel phenotypes, including domesticated species, originate and the influence of artificial selection on the domestication process. It is becoming clear that the more interesting question may be the origins of plant cultivation rather than the origins of agriculture. This paper reviews this body of evidence and assesses current views about how and why domestication and plant food production arose.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/659998

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spatial relationships between plants potentially used in the past for raw materials and ancient settlements of different sizes and spatial arrangements remain poorly understood.

    “While the distribution of tree species exploited for food is relatively well documented18–20, the spatial relationships between plants that could potentially be used in the past for raw materials and ancient settlements of different sizes and spatial arrangements remain poorly understood.”

    From Ecological legacies of pre-columbian settlements evident in palm clusters of neotropical mountain forests (2026) · cites this paper as [20]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 114

  1. 10.1073/pnas.0803780105 · DOI
  2. Anderson E., man, and life
  3. 10.1663/0013-0001(2006)60[143:FMSPFI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/2694877 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s10722-007-9209-6 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s10814-006-9003-6 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bray W. B., 1987, Manchester: British Archaeological Reports International.
  8. 10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.008 · DOI
  9. Burbridge R. E., 2004, Bolivian Amazon. Quaternary Research, 61, 215
  10. 10.1191/095968300672647521 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/340303a0 · DOI
  12. Carroll S. B., Endless forms most beautiful: the new science of evo devo
  13. 10.2307/25063072 · DOI
  14. Cavalier I., 1995, Bogotá, Colombia: Instituto Colombiano de Antropología, Fundación Erigaie.
  15. Chandler-Ezell K., 2006, Ecuador. Economic Botany, 60, 103, 10.1663/0013-0001(2006)60[103:RATPAS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  16. Cohen D. J., 2011, Current Anthropology, 52, S273, 10.1086/659965 · DOI
  17. Cross H., 2006, New York: Columbia University Press.
  18. Denham T., 2011, Current Anthropology, 52, S379, 10.1086/658682 · DOI
  19. Dickau R., Integrating zooarchaeology and paleoethnobotany: a consideration of issues, methods, and cases
  20. 10.1073/pnas.0611605104 · DOI
  21. 10.1073/pnas.0508583102 · DOI
  22. 10.2307/280679 · DOI
  23. 10.1126/science.1156533 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1126/science.1141395 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1017/S0003598X00067004 · DOI
  26. Dobney K., 2006, Journal of Zoology, 269, 261, 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00042.x · DOI
  27. 10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.092425 · DOI
  28. 10.1126/science.1128836 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.0509279102 · DOI
  30. Flannery K. V., Guilá Naquitz: archaic foraging and early agriculture in Oaxaca, Mexico, 10.4324/9781315427935 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/aob/mcm048 · DOI
  32. Gnecco C., 2006, Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
  33. 10.2307/4128417 · DOI
  34. 10.1086/605360 · DOI
  35. 10.1086/605684 · DOI
  36. 10.3732/ajb.91.11.1915 · DOI
  37. 10.1126/science.174.4008.468 · DOI
  38. Harlan J. R., Crops and man
  39. Harris D. R., 1972, American Scientist, 60, 180
  40. Harris D. R., Foraging and farming: the evolution of plant exploitation, 10.4324/9781315746425 · DOI
  41. Herrera L., 1992, Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
  42. 10.1073/pnas.0708736104 · DOI
  43. 10.1073/pnas.0702193104 · DOI
  44. Iriarte J., Rethinking agriculture
  45. 10.1086/605493 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/nature02983 · DOI
  47. Jones M., 2007, Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast.
  48. Kaplan L., 1999, Economic Botany, 53, 262
  49. Kennett D. J., 2006, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  50. 10.1126/science.1146921 · DOI
  51. 10.2135/cropsci2008.07.0421 · DOI
  52. Lauter N., 2002, Genetics, 160, 333, 10.1093/genetics/160.1.333 · DOI
  53. 10.1007/s10814-007-9011-1 · DOI
  54. 10.1073/pnas.052125199 · DOI
  55. 10.1139/g04-089 · DOI
  56. 10.1073/pnas.0505447102 · DOI
  57. Mora S., Early inhabitants of the Amazonian tropical rain forest: a study of humans and environmental dynamics. Latin American Archaeology Reports, 3
  58. Mora S., 1991, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh., 3
  59. Motta-Aldana J. R., Harlan II: biodiversity in agriculture: domestication, evolution, and sustainability
  60. 10.1098/rspb.2007.0826 · DOI
  61. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01493.x · DOI
  62. 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5586 · DOI
  63. 10.1126/science.199.4325.177 · DOI
  64. Pearsall D. M., Paleoethnobotany: a handbook of procedures
  65. 10.1016/S0305-4403(02)00237-6 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1016/j.jas.2003.09.010 · DOI
  67. 10.1126/science.1136914 · DOI
  68. 10.1038/435565a · DOI
  69. Piperno D. R., Phytolith analysis: an archaeological and geological perspective
  70. 10.1016/0305-4403(90)90048-A · DOI
  71. Piperno D. R., Foraging theory and the transition to agriculture
  72. Piperno D. R., Phytoliths: a comprehensive guide for archaeologists and paleoecologists, 10.1007/0-306-47668-1_11 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/j.quaint.2007.11.011 · DOI
  74. Piperno D. R., Harlan II: biodiversity in agriculture: domestication, evolution, and sustainability
  75. 10.1525/aa.1985.87.4.02a00090 · DOI
  76. 10.1073/pnas.0808752105 · DOI
  77. Piperno D. R., Agricultural origins and their social implications in South America
  78. 10.1073/pnas.0703442104 · DOI
  79. Piperno D. R., 1998, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  80. 10.1038/35038055 · DOI
  81. 10.1073/pnas.0812525106 · DOI
  82. 10.1126/science.1080365 · DOI
  83. Plowman T., Erythroxylum sp., in South and Central America. In Pre-Columbian plant migration
  84. 10.1073/pnas.0701425104 · DOI
  85. 10.1126/science.292.5520.1370 · DOI
  86. Ranere A. J., 2003, Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  87. 10.1073/pnas.0812590106 · DOI
  88. Raymond J. S., Handbook of South American archaeology
  89. Richardson J. B., Variations in anthropology: essays in honor of John C
  90. Rindos D., The origins of agriculture: an evolutionary perspective
  91. 10.1007/s00122-009-0981-x · DOI
  92. 10.1007/s10722-005-0774-2 · DOI
  93. Salgado H., El precerámico en el cañón del río Calima, cordillera occidental. In Ámbito y ocupaciones tempranas de la América Tropical
  94. 10.1016/S0031-0182(03)00270-0 · DOI
  95. 10.1073/pnas.012577299 · DOI · Paper page
  96. Sauer C. O., Handbook of South American Indians, 6
  97. 10.1126/science.1059519 · DOI
  98. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085153 · DOI
  99. 10.1086/204658 · DOI
  100. 10.4161/cib.2.6.9613 · DOI
  101. 10.2307/280325 · DOI
  102. 10.1073/pnas.1013011108 · DOI
  103. Vrydaghs L., 2007, Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast.
  104. Weir G. H., 1986, Los Angeles: Institute of Archaeology
  105. 10.1126/science.1127235 · DOI
  106. Weiss E., 2011, Current Anthropology, 52, S237, 10.1086/658367 · DOI
  107. Wessel-Beaver L., 2000, Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Report, 23, 54
  108. West-Eberhard M. J., Developmental plasticity and evolution, 10.1093/oso/9780195122343.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  109. 10.1007/s00122-004-1850-2 · DOI
  110. 10.1007/s00334-007-0121-y · DOI
  111. Zarillo S., 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 5005
  112. Zeder M. A., 2011, Current Anthropology, 52, S221, 10.1086/659307 · DOI
  113. 10.1086/605553 · DOI
  114. 10.1023/A:1026520507223 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Piperno, D. R.
Venue
Current Anthropology
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Published
2011-10
Volume
52
Issue
S4
Pages
S453-S470
ISSN
  • 0011-3204
  • 1537-5382
DOI
10.1086/659998
Cited by
427
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review