Cited by 128

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The identification and characterization of two phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 4-phosphatases

Ungewickell, Alexander, Hugge, Christopher, Kisseleva, Marina, Chang, Shao-Chun, Zou, Jun, Feng, Yucheng, Galyov, Edouard E., Wilson, Monita, Majerus, Philip W.·2005·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Numerous inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatases catalyze the degradation of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns-4,5-P 2 ) to phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate (PtdIns-4-P). An alternative pathway to degrade PtdIns-4,5-P 2 is the hydrolysis of PtdIns-4,5-P 2 by a 4-phosphatase, leading to the production of PtdIns-5-P. Whereas the bacterial IpgD enzyme is known to catalyze this reaction, no such mammalian enzyme has been found. We have identified and characterized two previously undescribed human enzymes, PtdIns-4,5-P 2 4-phosphatase type I and type II, which catalyze the hydrolysis of PtdIns-4,5-P 2 to phosphatidylinositol-5-phosphate (PtdIns-5-P). Both enzymes are ubiquitously expressed and localize to late endosomal/lysosomal membranes in epithelial cells. Overexpression of either enzyme in HeLa cells increases EGF-receptor degradation upon EGF stimulation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0509740102

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1074/jbc.M503366200 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S1388-1981(01)00165-2 · DOI
  3. 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4240 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/35073015 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1074/jbc.274.16.10669 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/36621 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.04.027 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0962-8924(02)02412-1 · DOI
  9. 10.1074/jbc.M311071200 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14057 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/emboj/cdf522 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)47197-4 · DOI
  13. 10.1074/jbc.M105969200 · DOI
  14. 10.1091/mbc.e04-03-0250 · DOI
  15. 10.1099/mic.0.27146-0 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00241-6 · DOI
  17. 10.1042/bj3570905 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01625-2 · DOI
  19. 10.1210/en.2004-0489 · DOI
  20. 10.1074/jbc.M207576200 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00132-5 · DOI
  22. 10.1074/jbc.C300296200 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00480-X · DOI
  24. 10.1083/jcb.135.6.1801 · DOI
  25. 10.1083/jcb.200303018 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/nrm1360 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81707-9 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1083/jcb.200505128 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ungewickell, A., Hugge, C., Kisseleva, M., Chang, S.-C., Zou, J., Feng, Y., Galyov, E. E., Wilson, M., & Majerus, P. W.
Affiliations
Division of Hematology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110; and Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Berkshire RG20 7NN, United Kingdom
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-12-19
Volume
102
Issue
52
Pages
18854-18859
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
128
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review