Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Salt screening and specific ion adsorption determine neutral-lipid membrane interactions

Open access
Petrache, Horia I., Zemb, Thomas, Belloni, Luc, Parsegian, V. Adrian·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The simplest, single-component biological membrane challenges accepted models of macromolecular interactions: lipid lamellar phases swell when immersed in monovalent salt solutions. Moreover, typical of a Hofmeister series, Br salts swell multilayers more than Cl salts, offering an excellent opportunity to investigate long-standing questions of ionic specificity. In accord with earlier measurements of liposome mobilities in electric fields, we find an added electrostatic repulsion of membranes due to anion binding, with a much stronger Br binding compared with Cl. However, contrary to the expectation that electrostatic repulsion should vanish in high salinity, swelling of lipid multilayers is monotonic with increasing salt concentration for both Br and Cl salts. The apparent contradiction is resolved by recognizing that although the electrostatic repulsion is progressively screened by increasing salt concentration, so is the van der Waals (vdW) attraction. Negligible in low salt, weakening of vdW forces becomes significant by the time electrostatic forces vanish. The result is a smooth monotonic swelling curve with no apparent distinction between low and high salt concentration regimes. Furthermore, when compared with theoretical predictions, measured vdW forces decay much too slowly with added salt. However, by accounting for the recently measured salt deficit near lipid bilayers, the expected scaling with Debye screening length is recovered. The combination of ion-specific binding and nonspecific ionic screening of low-frequency fluctuations explains salt effects on lipid membrane interactions and, by extension, explains specific (Hofmeister) effects at macromolecular interfaces between low and high dielectric.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0509967103

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Petrache, H. I., Zemb, T., Belloni, L., & Parsegian, V. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-05-23
Volume
103
Issue
21
Pages
7982-7987
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2096691541
Cited by
273
References
35
FWCI
10.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Salt screening and specific ion adsorption determine neutral-lipid membrane interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0509967103
The paper
Petrache, H. I., Zemb, T., Belloni, L., & Parsegian, V. A. (2006). Salt screening and specific ion adsorption determine neutral-lipid membrane interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0509967103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.