The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Isotopic evidence for large gaseous nitrogen losses from tropical rainforests
Open accessAbstract
The nitrogen isotopic composition ( 15 N/ 14 N) of forested ecosystems varies systematically worldwide. In tropical forests, which are elevated in 15 N relative to temperate biomes, a decrease in ecosystem 15 N/ 14 N with increasing rainfall has been reported. This trend is seen in a set of well characterized Hawaiian rainforests, across which we have measured the 15 N/ 14 N of inputs and hydrologic losses. We report that the two most widely purported mechanisms, an isotopic shift in N inputs or isotopic discrimination by leaching, fail to explain this climate-dependent trend in 15 N/ 14 N. Rather, isotopic discrimination by microbial denitrification appears to be the major determinant of N isotopic variations across differences in rainfall. In the driest climates, the 15 N/ 14 N of total dissolved outputs is higher than that of inputs, which can only be explained by a 14 N-rich gas loss. In contrast, in the wettest climates, denitrification completely consumes nitrate in local soil environments, thus preventing the expression of its isotope effect at the ecosystem scale. Under these conditions, the 15 N/ 14 N of bulk soils and stream outputs decrease to converge on the low 15 N/ 14 N of N inputs. N isotope budgets that account for such local isotopic underexpression suggest that denitrification is responsible for a large fraction (24–53%) of total ecosystem N loss across the sampled range in rainfall.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components
Field, C. B., Behrenfeld, M. J., Randerson, J. T., & Falkowski, P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.237 · Cited by 6,371
Nitrogen isotope dynamics of the Cariaco Basin, Venezuela
Thunell, R. C., Sigman, D. M., Muller‐Karger, F., Astor, Y., & Varela, R. (2004) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2003gb002185 · Cited by 185
Self-citation
Cited by
Van Der Heijden, M. G. A., Bardgett, R. D., & Van Straalen, N. M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x · Cited by 5,053
Jarman, C. L., Larsen, T., Hunt, T., Lipo, C., Solsvik, R., Wallsgrove, N., Ka'apu‐Lyons, C., Close, H. G., & Popp, B. N. (2017) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.23273 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Houlton, B. Z., Sigman, D. M., & Hedin, L. O.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-06-06
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 8745-8750
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2123002776
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isotopic evidence for large gaseous nitrogen losses from tropical rainforests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0510185103
- The paper
- Houlton, B. Z., Sigman, D. M., & Hedin, L. O. (2006). Isotopic evidence for large gaseous nitrogen losses from tropical rainforests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510185103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.