Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward understanding the genetics of alcohol drinking through transcriptome meta-analysis

Mulligan, Megan K., Ponomarev, Igor, Hitzemann, Robert J., Belknap, John K., Tabakoff, Boris, Harris, R. Adron, Crabbe, John C., Blednov, Yuri A., Grahame, Nicholas J., Phillips, Tamara J., Finn, Deborah A., Hoffman, Paula L., Iyer, Vishwanath R., Koob, George F., Bergeson, Susan E.·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Much evidence from studies in humans and animals supports the hypothesis that alcohol addiction is a complex disease with both hereditary and environmental influences. Molecular determinants of excessive alcohol consumption are difficult to study in humans. However, several rodent models show a high or low degree of alcohol preference, which provides a unique opportunity to approach the molecular complexities underlying the genetic predisposition to drink alcohol. Microarray analyses of brain gene expression in three selected lines, and six isogenic strains of mice known to differ markedly in voluntary alcohol consumption provided >4.5 million data points for a meta-analysis. A total of 107 arrays were obtained and arranged into six experimental data sets, allowing the identification of 3,800 unique genes significantly and consistently changed between all models of high or low amounts of alcohol consumption. Several functional groups, including mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and transcription regulation pathways, were found to be significantly overrepresented and may play an important role in establishing a high level of voluntary alcohol drinking in these mouse models. Data from the general meta-analysis was further filtered by a congenic strain microarray set, from which cis-regulated candidate genes for an alcohol preference quantitative trait locus on chromosome 9 were identified: Arhgef12 , Carm1 , Cryab , Cox5a , Dlat , Fxyd6 , Limd1 , Nicn1 , Nmnat3 , Pknox2 , Rbp1 , Sc5d , Scn4b , Tcf12 , Vps11 , and Zfp291 and four ESTs. The present study demonstrates the use of ( i ) a microarray meta-analysis to analyze a behavioral phenotype (in this case, alcohol preference) and ( ii ) a congenic strain for identification of cis regulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0510188103

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Mulligan, M. K., Ponomarev, I., Hitzemann, R. J., Belknap, J. K., Tabakoff, B., Harris, R. A., Crabbe, J. C., Blednov, Y. A., Grahame, N. J., Phillips, T. J., Finn, D. A., Hoffman, P. L., Iyer, V. R., Koob, G. F., & Bergeson, S. E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-04-18
Volume
103
Issue
16
Pages
6368-6373
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2016149358
Cited by
347
References
34
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward understanding the genetics of alcohol drinking through transcriptome meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0510188103
The paper
Mulligan, M. K., Ponomarev, I., Hitzemann, R. J., Belknap, J. K., Tabakoff, B., Harris, R. A., Crabbe, J. C., Blednov, Y. A., Grahame, N. J., Phillips, T. J., Finn, D. A., Hoffman, P. L., Iyer, V. R., Koob, G. F., & Bergeson, S. E. (2006). Toward understanding the genetics of alcohol drinking through transcriptome meta-analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510188103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.