The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RETRACTED: Cell–cell signaling in Xanthomonas campestris involves an HD-GYP domain protein that functions in cyclic di-GMP turnover
Abstract
HD-GYP is a protein domain of unknown biochemical function implicated in bacterial signaling and regulation. In the plant pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris , the synthesis of virulence factors and dispersal of biofilms are positively controlled by a two-component signal transduction system comprising the HD-GYP domain regulatory protein RpfG and cognate sensor RpfC and by cell–cell signaling mediated by the diffusible signal molecule DSF (diffusible signal factor). The RpfG/RpfC two-component system has been implicated in DSF perception and signal transduction. Here we show that the role of RpfG is to degrade the unusual nucleotide cyclic di-GMP, an activity associated with the HD-GYP domain. Mutation of the conserved H and D residues of the isolated HD-GYP domain resulted in loss of both the enzymatic activity against cyclic di-GMP and the regulatory activity in virulence factor synthesis. Two other protein domains, GGDEF and EAL, are already implicated in the synthesis and degradation respectively of cyclic di-GMP. As with GGDEF and EAL domains, the HD-GYP domain is widely distributed in free-living bacteria and occurs in plant and animal pathogens, as well as beneficial symbionts and organisms associated with a range of environmental niches. Identification of the role of the HD-GYP domain thus increases our understanding of a signaling network whose importance to the lifestyle of diverse bacteria is now emerging.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pseudomonas biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance are linked to phenotypic variation
Drenkard, E., & Ausubel, F. M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416740a · Cited by 997
Cited by
Should we stay or should we go: mechanisms and ecological consequences for biofilm dispersal
McDougald, D., Rice, S. A., Barraud, N., Steinberg, P. D., & Kjelleberg, S. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2695 · Cited by 881
Molecular Mechanisms of Two-Component Signal Transduction
Zschiedrich, C. P., Keidel, V., & Szurmant, H. (2016) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2016.08.003 · Cited by 540
Sambanthamoorthy, K., Sloup, R. E., Parashar, V., Smith, J. M., Kim, E. E., Semmelhack, M. F., Neiditch, M. B., & Waters, C. M. (2012) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01396-12 · Cited by 151
Kim, B., Park, J.-S., Choi, H.-Y., Yoon, S. S., & Kim, W.-G. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26974-5 · Cited by 103
Klebensberger, J., Lautenschlager, K., Bressler, D., Wingender, J., & Philipp, B. (2007) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01339.x · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryan, R. P., Fouhy, Y., Lucey, J. F., Crossman, L. C., Spiro, S., He, Y.-W., Zhang, L.-H., Heeb, S., Cámara, M., Williams, P., & Dow, J. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-04-25
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6712-6717
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2156062569
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.