The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Discrete and analogue quantity processing in the parietal lobe: A functional MRI study
Abstract
The human intraparietal sulcus (IPS) is implicated in processing symbolic number information and possibly in nonsymbolic number information. Specific IPS activity for discrete quantities (numerosities) as compared with continuous, analogue quantity has not been demonstrated. Here we use a stimulus-driven paradigm to distinguish automatic estimation of “how many things” from “how much” and “how long.” The discrete analogue response task (DART) uses the perception of hues which can change either abruptly (discrete, numerous stimuli) or smoothly (analogue, nonnumerous stimuli) in space or in time. Subjects decide whether they saw more green or more blue. A conjunction analysis of spatial and temporal conditions revealed that bilateral IPS was significantly more active during the processing of discrete stimuli than during analogue stimuli, as was a parietal-occipital transition zone. We suggest that processing numerosity is a distinct process from processing analogue quantity, whether extended in space or time, and that an intraparietal network connects objects’ segmentation to the estimation of their numerosity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality
MOYER, R. S., & LANDAUER, T. K. (1967) · Nature · doi:10.1038/2151519a0 · Cited by 2,068
Dreaming and episodic memory: a functional dissociation?
Fosse, M. J., Fosse, R., Hobson, J. A., & Stickgold, R. J. (2003) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892903321107774 · Cited by 388
Cited by
Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample
Halberda, J., Ly, R., Wilmer, J. B., Naiman, D. Q., & Germine, L. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1200196109 · Cited by 477
Domain‐specific and domain‐general changes in children's development of number comparison
Holloway, I. D., & Ansari, D. (2008) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00712.x · Cited by 153
Discovering the structure of mathematical problem solving
Anderson, J. R., Lee, H. S., & Fincham, J. M. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.031 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Castelli, F., Glaser, D. E., & Butterworth, B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-03-14
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4693-4698
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2169581297
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.