Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MicroRNA fingerprints during human megakaryocytopoiesis

Garzon, Ramiro, Pichiorri, Flavia, Palumbo, Tiziana, Iuliano, Rodolfo, Cimmino, Amelia, Aqeilan, Rami, Volinia, Stefano, Bhatt, Darshna, Alder, Hansjuerg, Marcucci, Guido, Calin, George A., Liu, Chang-Gong, Bloomfield, Clara D., Andreeff, Michael, Croce, Carlo M.·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

microRNAs are a highly conserved class of noncoding RNAs with important regulatory functions in proliferation, apoptosis, development, and differentiation. To discover novel regulatory pathways during megakaryocytic differentiation, we performed microRNA expression profiling of in vitro -differentiated megakaryocytes derived from CD34 + hematopoietic progenitors. The main finding was down-regulation of miR-10a , miR-126 , miR-106 , miR-10b , miR-17 and miR-20 . Hypothetically, the down-regulation of microRNAs unblocks target genes involved in differentiation. We confirmed in vitro and in vivo that miR-130a targets the transcription factor MAFB , which is involved in the activation of the GPIIB promoter, a key protein for platelet physiology. In addition, we found that miR-10a expression in differentiated megakaryocytes is inverse to that of HOXA1 , and we showed that HOXA1 is a direct target of miR-10a . Finally, we compared the microRNA expression of megakaryoblastic leukemic cell lines with that of in vitro differentiated megakaryocytes and CD34 + progenitors. This analysis revealed up-regulation of miR-101 , miR-126 , miR-99a , miR-135 , and miR-20 . Our data delineate the expression of microRNAs during megakaryocytopoiesis and suggest a regulatory role of microRNAs in this process by targeting megakaryocytic transcription factors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0600587103

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 414

Metadata

Authors
Garzon, R., Pichiorri, F., Palumbo, T., Iuliano, R., Cimmino, A., Aqeilan, R., Volinia, S., Bhatt, D., Alder, H., Marcucci, G., Calin, G. A., Liu, C.-G., Bloomfield, C. D., Andreeff, M., & Croce, C. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-03-20
Volume
103
Issue
13
Pages
5078-5083
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W4245652485
Cited by
414
References
6
FWCI
21.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MicroRNA fingerprints during human megakaryocytopoiesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0600587103
The paper
Garzon, R., Pichiorri, F., Palumbo, T., Iuliano, R., Cimmino, A., Aqeilan, R., Volinia, S., Bhatt, D., Alder, H., Marcucci, G., Calin, G. A., Liu, C.-G., Bloomfield, C. D., Andreeff, M., & Croce, C. M. (2006). MicroRNA fingerprints during human megakaryocytopoiesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600587103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.