Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 356

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental determination of the radiation dose limit for cryocooled protein crystals

Owen, Robin Leslie, Rudiño-Piñera, Enrique, Garman, Elspeth F.·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Radiation damage to cryocooled protein crystals during x-ray structure determination has become an inherent part of macromolecular diffraction data collection at third-generation synchrotrons. Generally, radiation damage is an undesirable component of the experiment and can result in erroneous structural detail in the final model. The characterization of radiation damage thus has become an important area for structural biologists. The calculated dose limit of 2 × 10 7 Gy for the diffracting power of cryocooled protein crystals to drop by half has been experimentally evaluated at a third-generation synchrotron source. Successive data sets were collected from four holoferritin and three apoferritin crystals. The absorbed dose for each crystal was calculated by using the program raddose after measurement of the incident photon flux and determination of the elemental crystal composition by micro-particle-induced x-ray emission. Degradation in diffraction quality and specific structural changes induced by synchrotron radiation then could be compared directly with absorbed dose for different dose/dose rate regimes: a 10% lifetime decrease for a 10-fold dose rate increase was observed. Remarkable agreement both between different crystals of the same type and between apoferritin and holoferritin was observed for the dose required to reduce the diffracted intensity by half ( D 1/2 ). From these measurements, a dose limit of D 1/2 = 4.3 (±0.3) ×10 7 Gy was obtained. However, by considering other data quality indicators, an intensity reduction to I ln2 = ln2 × I 0 , corresponding to an absorbed dose of 3.0 × 10 7 Gy, is recommended as an appropriate dose limit for typical macromolecular crystallography experiments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0600973103

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 356

Metadata

Authors
Owen, R. L., Rudiño-Piñera, E., & Garman, E. F.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-03-20
Volume
103
Issue
13
Pages
4912-4917
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1973881708
Cited by
356
References
21
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental determination of the radiation dose limit for cryocooled protein crystals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0600973103
The paper
Owen, R. L., Rudiño-Piñera, E., & Garman, E. F. (2006). Experimental determination of the radiation dose limit for cryocooled protein crystals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600973103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.