The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Running over rough terrain reveals limb control for intrinsic stability
Open accessAbstract
Legged animals routinely negotiate rough, unpredictable terrain with agility and stability that outmatches any human-built machine. Yet, we know surprisingly little about how animals accomplish this. Current knowledge is largely limited to studies of steady movement. These studies have revealed fundamental mechanisms used by terrestrial animals for steady locomotion. However, it is unclear whether these models provide an appropriate framework for the neuromuscular and mechanical strategies used to achieve dynamic stability over rough terrain. Perturbation experiments shed light on this issue, revealing the interplay between mechanics and neuromuscular control. We measured limb mechanics of helmeted guinea fowl ( Numida meleagris ) running over an unexpected drop in terrain, comparing their response to predictions of the mass–spring running model. Adjustment of limb contact angle explains 80% of the variation in stance-phase limb loading following the perturbation. Surprisingly, although limb stiffness varies dramatically, it does not influence the response. This result agrees with a mass–spring model, although it differs from previous findings on humans running over surfaces of varying compliance. However, guinea fowl sometimes deviate from mass–spring dynamics through posture-dependent work performance of the limb, leading to substantial energy absorption following the perturbation. This posture-dependent actuation allows the animal to absorb energy and maintain desired velocity on a sudden substrate drop. Thus, posture-dependent work performance of the limb provides inherent velocity control over rough terrain. These findings highlight how simple mechanical models extend to unsteady conditions, providing fundamental insights into neuromuscular control of movement and the design of dynamically stable legged robots and prosthetic devices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Models, feedback control, and open problems of 3D bipedal robotic walking
Grizzle, J. W., Chevallereau, C., Sinnet, R. W., & Ames, A. D. (2014) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2014.04.021 · Cited by 321
Neuromechanics: an integrative approach for understanding motor control
Nishikawa, K., Biewener, A. A., Aerts, P., Ahn, A. N., Chiel, H. J., Daley, M. A., Daniel, T. L., Full, R. J., Hale, M. E., Hedrick, T. L., et al. (2007) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icm024 · Cited by 302
Self-citationBlind Bipedal Stair Traversal via Sim-to-Real Reinforcement Learning
Siekmann, J., Green, K., Warila, J., Fern, A., & Hurst, J. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.08328 · Cited by 193
Blind Bipedal Stair Traversal via Sim-to-Real Reinforcement Learning
Siekmann, J., Green, K., Warila, J., Fern, A., & Hurst, J. (2021) · Robotics: Science and Systems XVII · doi:10.15607/rss.2021.xvii.061 · Cited by 193
Biomechanics and energetics of walking on uneven terrain
Voloshina, A. S., Kuo, A. D., Daley, M. A., & Ferris, D. P. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.081711 · Cited by 177
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Daley, M. A., & Biewener, A. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-10-17
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 15681-15686
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1989665388
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Running over rough terrain reveals limb control for intrinsic stability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0601473103
- The paper
- Daley, M. A., & Biewener, A. A. (2006). Running over rough terrain reveals limb control for intrinsic stability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601473103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.