The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Blind Bipedal Stair Traversal via Sim-to-Real Reinforcement Learning
Open accessAbstract
Accurate and precise terrain estimation is a difficult problem for robot locomotion in real-world environments. Thus, it is useful to have systems that do not depend on accurate estimation to the point of fragility. In this paper, we explore the limits of such an approach by investigating the problem of traversing stair-like terrain without any external perception or terrain models on a bipedal robot. For such blind bipedal platforms, the problem appears difficult (even for humans) due to the surprise elevation changes. Our main contribution is to show that sim-to-real reinforcement learning (RL) can achieve robust locomotion over stair-like terrain on the bipedal robot Cassie using only proprioceptive feedback. Importantly, this only requires modifying an existing flat-terrain training RL framework to include stair-like terrain randomization, without any changes in reward function. To our knowledge, this is the first controller for a bipedal, human-scale robot capable of reliably traversing a variety of real-world stairs and other stair-like disturbances using only proprioception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Experimental results in [61] show that the LSTM controller with different terrain parameters has the highest overall probability of success in the task.
“The experimental results show that the rst is the one with the highest overall probability of success in the task.”
From Crossing the Reality Gap: A Survey on Sim-to-Real Transferability of Robot Controllers in Reinforcement Learning (2021) · cites this paper as [61]
Thus, the combination of LSTM and DR seems to be an effective solution to the problem for the tested task.
“Thus, the combination of LSTM and DR seems to be an effective solution to the problem for the tested task.”
From Crossing the Reality Gap: A Survey on Sim-to-Real Transferability of Robot Controllers in Reinforcement Learning (2021) · cites this paper as [61]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Joonho Lee, Jemin Hwangbo, Lorenz Wellhausen, Vladlen Koltun, and Marco Hutter. Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain. Science Robotics, 5(47):eabc5986, Oct 2020. ISSN 2470-9476. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abc5986. · DOI · Paper page
- Gerardo Bledt, Matthew J Powell, Benjamin Katz, Jared Di Carlo, Patrick M Wensing, and Sangbae Kim. MIT Cheetah 3: Design and control of a robust, dynamic quadruped robot. In 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Con- ference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 2245-2252. IEEE, 2018.
- Hae-Won Park, Alireza Ramezani, and Jessy W Grizzle. A finite-state machine for accommodating unexpected large ground-height variations in bipedal robot walking. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 29(2):331-345, 2012.
- J-S Gutmann, Masaki Fukuchi, and Masahiro Fujita. Stair climbing for humanoid robots using stereo vi- sion. In 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)(IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37566), volume 2, pages 1407-1413. IEEE, 2004.
- Amos Albert, Michael Suppa, and Wilfried Gerth. Detec- tion of stair dimensions for the path planning of a bipedal robot. In 2001 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. Proceedings (Cat. No. 01TH8556), volume 2, pages 1291-1296. IEEE, 2001.
- Philipp Michel, Joel Chestnutt, Satoshi Kagami, Koichi Nishiwaki, James Kuffner, and Takeo Kanade. GPU- accelerated real-time 3D tracking for humanoid locomo- tion and stair climbing. In 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 463-469. IEEE, 2007.
- Stéphane Caron, Abderrahmane Kheddar, and Olivier Tempier. Stair climbing stabilization of the HRP-4 humanoid robot using whole-body admittance control. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automa- tion (ICRA), pages 277-283. IEEE, 2019.
- Giorgio Figliolini and Marco Ceccarelli. Climbing stairs with EP-WAR2 biped robot. In Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automa- tion (Cat. No. 01CH37164), volume 4, pages 4116-4121. IEEE, 2001.
- Michele Focchi, Romeo Orsolino, Marco Camurri, Vic- tor Barasuol, Carlos Mastalli, Darwin G. Caldwell, and Claudio Semini. Heuristic Planning for Rough Terrain Locomotion in Presence of External Distur- bances and Variable Perception Quality, volume 132, pages 165-209. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020. ISBN 978-3-030-22327-4. doi: 10.1007/ 978-3-030-22327-4 9. · DOI · Paper page
- Zhaoming Xie, Glen Berseth, Patrick Clary, Jonathan Hurst, and Michiel van de Panne. Feedback control for cassie with deep reinforcement learning. In 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 1241-1246. IEEE, 2018.
- Jonah Siekmann, Yesh Godse, Alan Fern, and Jonathan Hurst. Sim-to-Real Learning of All Common Bipedal Gaits via Periodic Reward Composition. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2021.
- Richard S Sutton and Andrew G Barto. Reinforcement learning: An introduction. MIT press, 2018.
- Xue Bin Peng and Michiel van de Panne. Learning Locomotion Skills Using DeepRL: Does the Choice of Action Space Matter? CoRR, abs/1611.01055, 2016. · DOI
- X. B. Peng, M. Andrychowicz, W. Zaremba, and P. Abbeel. Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomization. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 3803-3810, 2018. doi: 10.1109/ICRA.2018.8460528. · DOI · Paper page
- Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. Long short- term memory. Neural computation, 9(8):1735-1780, 1997. · DOI · Paper page
- Jonah Siekmann, Srikar Valluri, Jeremy Dao, Lorenzo Bermillo, Helei Duan, Alan Fern, and Jonathan Hurst. Learning memory-based control for human-scale bipedal locomotion. In Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, July 2020.
- Farzad Adbolhosseini, Hung Yu Ling, Zhaoming Xie, Xue Bin Peng, and Michiel van de Panne. On Learning Symmetric Locomotion. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH Motion, Interaction, and Games (MIG 2019), 2019. · DOI
- Emanuel Todorov, Tom Erez, and Yuval Tassa. Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 5026-5033. IEEE, 2012.
- Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014. · arXiv
- KL Poggensee, MA Sharbafi, and A Seyfarth. Charac- terizing swing-leg retraction in human locomotion. In Mobile Service Robotics, pages 377-384. World Scien- tific, 2014. · DOI
- Monica A. Daley and Andrew A. Biewener. Running over rough terrain reveals limb control for intrinsic sta- bility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(42):15681-15686, 2006. ISSN 0027-8424. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601473103. · DOI
- Yvonne Blum, Susanne W Lipfert, Juergen Rummel, and André Seyfarth. Swing leg control in human running. Bioinspiration & biomimetics, 5(2):026006, 2010. · DOI
- André Seyfarth, Hartmut Geyer, and Hugh Herr. Swing- leg retraction: a simple control model for stable running. Journal of Experimental Biology, 206(15):2547-2555, 2003.
- Aleksandra V. Birn-Jeffery, Christian M. Hubicki, Yvonne Blum, Daniel Renjewski, Jonathan W. Hurst, and Monica A. Daley. Don't break a leg: running birds from quail to ostrich prioritise leg safety and economy on uneven terrain. Journal of Experimental Biology, 217(21):3786-3796, 2014. ISSN 0022-0949. doi: 10.1242/jeb.102640. · DOI
- Jerry Pratt and Chee-Meng Chew and Ann Torres and Peter Dilworth and Gill Pratt. Virtual model control: An intuitive approach for bipedal locomotion. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 20(2):129- 143, 2001. doi: 10.1177/02783640122067309. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Salvato, E., Fenu, G., Medvet, E., & Pellegrino, F. A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3126658 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Siekmann, J., Green, K., Warila, J., Fern, A., & Hurst, J.
- Affiliations
- Oregon State University (US)
- ORCID
- Fern, Alan
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- arXiv
- 2105.08328
- OpenAlex
- W3162157701
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 62.51
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Robotics: Science and Systems (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1849343)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (W911NF-16-1-0002, -16-1-0002)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
- Keywords
- bipedalism, sim-to-real transfer, reinforcement learning, Cassie robot, proprioception, terrain estimation, legged robot control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review