Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Voltage sensor conformations in the open and closed states in rosetta structural models of K + channels

Yarov-Yarovoy, Vladimir, Baker, David, Catterall, William A.·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Voltage-gated ion channels control generation and propagation of action potentials in excitable cells. Significant progress has been made in understanding structure and function of the voltage-gated ion channels, highlighted by the high-resolution open-state structure of the voltage-gated potassium channel, K v 1.2. However, because the structure of the closed state is unknown, the gating mechanism remains controversial. We adapted the rosetta membrane method to model the structures of the K v 1.2 and KvAP channels using homology, de novo , and domain assembly methods and selected the most plausible models using a limited number of experimental constraints. Our model of K v 1.2 in the open state is very similar in overall topology to the x-ray structure of this channel. Modeling of KvAP in the open state suggests that orientation of the voltage-sensing domain relative to the pore-forming domain is considerably different from the orientation in the K v 1.2 open state and that the magnitude of the vertical movement of S4 is significantly greater. Structural modeling of closed state of K v 1.2 suggests gating movement that can be viewed as a sum of two previously suggested mechanisms: translation (2–4 Å) plus rotation (≈180°) of the S4 segment as proposed in the original “sliding helix” or “helical screw” models coupled with a rolling motion of the S1–S3 segments around S4, similar to recent “transporter” models of gating. We propose a unified mechanism of voltage-dependent gating for K v 1.2 and KvAP in which this major conformational change moves the gating charge across the electric field in an analogous way for both channels.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0602350103

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Yarov-Yarovoy, V., Baker, D., & Catterall, W. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-05-09
Volume
103
Issue
19
Pages
7292-7297
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1999108741
Cited by
211
References
1
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Voltage sensor conformations in the open and closed states in rosetta structural models of K + channels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0602350103
The paper
Yarov-Yarovoy, V., Baker, D., & Catterall, W. A. (2006). Voltage sensor conformations in the open and closed states in rosetta structural models of K + channels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602350103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.