The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How to become a uropathogen: Comparative genomic analysis of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli strains
Open accessAbstract
Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) strain 536 (O6:K15:H31) is one of the model organisms of extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC). To analyze this strain's genetic basis of urovirulence, we sequenced the entire genome and compared the data with the genome sequence of UPEC strain CFT073 (O6:K2:H1) and to the available genomes of nonpathogenic E. coli strain MG1655 (K-12) and enterohemorrhagic E. coli . The genome of strain 536 is ≈292 kb smaller than that of strain CFT073. Genomic differences between both UPEC are mainly restricted to large pathogenicity islands, parts of which are unique to strain 536 or CFT073. Genome comparison underlines that repeated insertions and deletions in certain parts of the genome contribute to genome evolution. Furthermore, 427 and 432 genes are only present in strain 536 or in both UPEC, respectively. The majority of the latter genes is encoded within smaller horizontally acquired DNA regions scattered all over the genome. Several of these genes are involved in increasing the pathogens' fitness and adaptability. Analysis of virulence-associated traits expressed in the two UPEC O6 strains, together with genome comparison, demonstrate the marked genetic and phenotypic variability among UPEC. The ability to accumulate and express a variety of virulence-associated genes distinguishes ExPEC from many commensals and forms the basis for the individual virulence potential of ExPEC. Accordingly, instead of a common virulence mechanism, different ways exist among ExPEC to cause disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genomic Islands in Pathogenic and Environmental Microorganisms
Dobrindt, U., Hochhut, B., Hentschel, U., & Hacker, J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro884 · Cited by 1,188
Self-citation
Cited by
Origins and virulence mechanisms of uropathogenic Escherichia coli
Wiles, T. J., Kulesus, R. R., & Mulvey, M. A. (2008) · Experimental and Molecular Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.yexmp.2008.03.007 · Cited by 606
Escherichia coli in the Environment: Implications for Water Quality and Human Health
Ishii, S., & Sadowsky, M. J. (2008) · Microbes and Environments · doi:10.1264/jsme2.23.101 · Cited by 527
Stecher, B., Denzler, R., Maier, L., Bernet, F., Sanders, M. J., Pickard, D. J., Barthel, M., Westendorf, A. M., Krogfelt, K. A., Walker, A. W., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1113246109 · Cited by 492
Self-citationE. coli as an All-Rounder: The Thin Line Between Commensalism and Pathogenicity
Leimbach, A., Hacker, J., & Dobrindt, U. (2013) · Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1007/82_2012_303 · Cited by 366
Self-citationGarcia, E. C., Brumbaugh, A. R., & Mobley, H. L. T. (2011) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.01222-10 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Brzuszkiewicz, E., Brüggemann, H., Liesegang, H., Emmerth, M., Ölschläger, T., Nagy, G., Albermann, K., Wagner, C., Buchrieser, C., Emődy, L., Gottschalk, G., Hacker, J., & Dobrindt, U.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-08-22
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 12879-12884
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2141292721
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How to become a uropathogen: Comparative genomic analysis of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli strains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0603038103
- The paper
- Brzuszkiewicz, E., Brüggemann, H., Liesegang, H., Emmerth, M., Ölschläger, T., Nagy, G., Albermann, K., Wagner, C., Buchrieser, C., Emődy, L., Gottschalk, G., Hacker, J., & Dobrindt, U. (2006). How to become a uropathogen: Comparative genomic analysis of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli strains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603038103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.