Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 801

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Impacts of genetic bottlenecks on soybean genome diversity

Open access
Hyten, David L., Song, Qijian, Zhu, Youlin, Choi, Ik-Young, Nelson, Randall L., Costa, Jose M., Specht, James E., Shoemaker, Randy C., Cregan, Perry B.·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Soybean has undergone several genetic bottlenecks. These include domestication in Asia to produce numerous Asian landraces, introduction of relatively few landraces to North America, and then selective breeding over the past 75 years. It is presumed that these three human-mediated events have reduced genetic diversity. We sequenced 111 fragments from 102 genes in four soybean populations representing the populations before and after genetic bottlenecks. We show that soybean has lost many rare sequence variants and has undergone numerous allele frequency changes throughout its history. Although soybean genetic diversity has been eroded by human selection after domestication, it is notable that modern cultivars have retained 72% of the sequence diversity present in the Asian landraces but lost 79% of rare alleles (frequency ≤0.10) found in the Asian landraces. Simulations indicated that the diversity lost through the genetic bottlenecks of introduction and plant breeding was mostly due to the small number of Asian introductions and not the artificial selection subsequently imposed by selective breeding. The bottleneck with the most impact was domestication; when the low sequence diversity present in the wild species was halved, 81% of the rare alleles were lost, and 60% of the genes exhibited evidence of significant allele frequency changes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0604379103

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Genetic Vulnerability of Major Crops (Natl Acad Sci, Washington, DC, 1972).
  2. 10.1038/nrg1729 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.277.5329.1063 · DOI · Paper page
  4. JR Wilcox Soybeans: Improvement, Production, and Uses, eds HR Boerma, JE Specht (Am Soc of Agronomy, Crop Sci Soc of Am, Soil Sci Soc of Am, Madison, WI), pp. 1–14, Vol Agronomy, no 16. (2004).
  5. TE Carter, R Nelson, CH Sneller, Z Cui Soybeans: Improvement, Production, and Uses, eds HR Boerma, JE Specht (Am Soc of Agronomy, Crop Sci Soc of Am, Soil Sci Soc of Am, Madison, WI), pp. 303–416, Vol Agronomy, no 16. (2004).
  6. R Halliburton Introduction to Population Genetics. (Pearson/Prentice– Hall Upper Saddle River NJ 2004).
  7. 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400050001x · doi:10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183x003400050001x
  8. 10.1093/genetics/163.3.1123 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1093/genetics/105.2.437 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/10297 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/10290 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1534/genetics.167.1.471 · DOI
  14. 10.1126/science.1107891 · DOI · Paper page
  15. TE Carter, Z Gizlice, JW Burton Coefficient of Parentage and Genetic Similarity Estimates for 258 North American Soybean Cultivars Released byPublic Agencies During 1954–88 (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USDA Tech Bull 1814. (1993).
  16. BS Weir Genetic Data Analysis II: Methods for Discrete Population Genetic Data (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 1996).
  17. 10.1073/pnas.151244298 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1094/PD-69-593 · doi:10.1094/pd-69-593
  19. 10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100040035x · doi:10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183x001100040035x
  20. 10.2135/cropsci1968.0011183X000800060026x · doi:10.2135/cropsci1968.0011183x000800060026x
  21. 10.1017/S0016672301005158 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1073/pnas.0404231101 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1534/genetics.104.033795 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1073/pnas.0409804102 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1093/molbev/msi035 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.2135/cropsci2001.4141337x · DOI
  27. 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600030038x · doi:10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183x003600030038x
  28. P Keim, TC Olson, RC Shoemaker Soybean Genet Newsl 15, 150–152 (1988).
  29. 10.1007/s00122-004-1602-3 · doi:10.1007/s00122-004-1602-3
  30. 10.1038/70570 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1186/1471-2105-7-4 · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-4
  32. 10.1101/gr.8.3.195 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.2.174 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1093/genetics/132.2.583 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 801

Metadata

Authors
Hyten, D. L., Song, Q., Zhu, Y., Choi, I.-Y., Nelson, R. L., Costa, J. M., Specht, J. E., Shoemaker, R. C., & Cregan, P. B.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-11-07
Volume
103
Issue
45
Pages
16666-16671
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2053809220
Cited by
801
References
0
FWCI
16.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impacts of genetic bottlenecks on soybean genome diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0604379103
The paper
Hyten, D. L., Song, Q., Zhu, Y., Choi, I.-Y., Nelson, R. L., Costa, J. M., Specht, J. E., Shoemaker, R. C., & Cregan, P. B. (2006). Impacts of genetic bottlenecks on soybean genome diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0604379103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.