The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Population Genetics and the Search for Adaptive Evolution in Plants
Open accessAbstract
The first papers on plant molecular population genetics were published approximately 10 years ago. Since that time, well over 50 additional studies of plant nucleotide polymorphism have been published, and many of these studies focused on detecting the signature of balancing or positive selection at a locus. In this review, we discuss some of the theoretical and statistical issues surrounding the detection of selection, with focus on plant populations, and we also summarize the empirical plant molecular population genetics literature. At face value, the literature suggests that a history of balancing or positive selection in plant genes is rampant. In two well-studied taxa (maize and Arabidopsis) over 20% of studied genes have been interpreted as containing the signature of selection. We argue that this is probably an overstatement of the prevalence of natural selection in plant genomes, for two reasons. First, demographic effects are difficult to incorporate and have generally not been well integrated into the plant population genetics literature. Second, the genes studied to date are not a random sample, so selected genes may be overrepresented. The next generation of studies in plant molecular population genetics requires additional sampling of local populations, explicit comparisons among loci, and improved theoretical methods to control for demography. Eventually, candidate loci should be confirmed by explicit consideration of phenotypic effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.
Tajima, F. (1989) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/123.3.585 · Cited by 13,941
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination
Watterson, G. A. (1975) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9 · Cited by 3,915
Evolutionary Rate at the Molecular Level
KIMURA, M. (1968) · Nature · doi:10.1038/217624a0 · Cited by 3,737
The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene
Smith, J. M., & Haigh, J. (1974) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300014634 · Cited by 3,415
The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene
MAYNARD, J., & HAIGH, J. (2007) · Genetics Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672308009579 · Cited by 2,643
Generating samples under a Wright–Fisher neutral model of genetic variation
Hudson, R. R. (2002) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.2.337 · Cited by 2,364
Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure
Sabeti, P. C., Reich, D. E., Higgins, J. M., Levine, H. Z. P., Richter, D. J., Schaffner, S. F., Gabriel, S. B., Platko, J. V., Patterson, N. J., McDonald, G. J., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01140 · Cited by 2,106
Statistical tests of selective neutrality in the age of genomics
Nielsen, R. (2001) · Heredity · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00895.x · Cited by 1,908
Gene genealogies and the coalescent process.
Hudson, R. R. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,838
Cited by
Biological invasions, climate change and genomics
Chown, S. L., Hodgins, K. A., Griffin, P. C., Oakeshott, J. G., Byrne, M., & Hoffmann, A. A. (2015) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12234 · Cited by 284
Philippe, R., Courtois, B., McNally, K. L., Mournet, P., El-Malki, R., Le Paslier, M. C., Fabre, D., Billot, C., Brunel, D., Glaszmann, J.-C., et al. (2010) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-010-1348-z · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, S. I., & Gaut, B. S.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-11-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 506-519
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2123720538
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 103
- FWCI
- 11.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Population Genetics and the Search for Adaptive Evolution in Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/molbev/msi035
- The paper
- Wright, S. I., & Gaut, B. S. (2005). Molecular Population Genetics and the Search for Adaptive Evolution in Plants. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msi035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.