CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 265Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersElectromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prenatal exposure to ultrasound waves impacts neuronal migration in mice

Open access
Ang, Eugenius S. B. C., Gluncic, Vicko, Duque, Alvaro, Schafer, Mark E., Rakic, Pasko·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0605294103
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Neurons of the cerebral neocortex in mammals, including humans, are generated during fetal life in the proliferative zones and then migrate to their final destinations by following an inside-to-outside sequence. The present study examined the effect of ultrasound waves (USW) on neuronal position within the embryonic cerebral cortex in mice. We used a single BrdU injection to label neurons generated at embryonic day 16 and destined for the superficial cortical layers. Our analysis of over 335 animals reveals that, when exposed to USW for a total of 30 min or longer during the period of their migration, a small but statistically significant number of neurons fail to acquire their proper position and remain scattered within inappropriate cortical layers and/or in the subjacent white matter. The magnitude of dispersion of labeled neurons was variable but systematically increased with duration of exposure to USW. These results call for a further investigation in larger and slower-developing brains of non-human primates and continued scrutiny of unnecessarily long prenatal ultrasound exposure.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0605294103

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. P. Rakic Science l83, 425–427 (l974).
  2. T. L. Kemper, A. Lecours, M. J. Gates, P. I. Yakovlev Early Dev. 51, 23–62 (1973).
  3. W. J. Schull, J. Dobbing, Y. Kameyama, R. O’Rahilly, P. Rakic, G. Silini Ann. ICRP 16, 1–43 (1986).
  4. C. R. Stark, M. Orleans, A. D. Haverkamp, J. Murphy Obstet. Gynecol. 63, 194–200 (1984).
  5. J. D. Campbell, R. W. Elford, R. F. Brant Can. Med. Assoc. J. 149, 1435–1440 (1993).
  6. P. Rakic J. Comp. Neurol. l4l, 283–3l2 (l971).
  7. ; National Electrical Manufacturers Association Standard for Real-Time Display of Thermal and Mechanical Acoustic Output Indices on Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment, Standards Publication UD 3-2003. (Natl. Electric. Manuf. Assoc., Rosslyn, VA, Revision 2. (2003).
  8. ; Center for Devices and Radiological Health Information for Manufacturers Seeking Marketing Clearance of Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems and Transducers (Food and Drug Admin, Rockville, MD, 1997).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–264 of 264

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ang, E. S. B. C., Gluncic, V., Duque, A., Schafer, M. E., & Rakic, P.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • *Department of Neurobiology and Kavli Institute for Neuroscience, Yale Medical School, Sterling Hall of Medicine, Room C-318, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510; and
  • Sonic Tech, Inc., 23 Brookline Court, Ambler, PA 19002
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-08-22
Volume
103
Issue
34
Pages
12903-12910
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.0605294103
OpenAlex
W2049591511
Cited by
265
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Keywords
prenatal ultrasound exposure, neuronal migration, cerebral cortex, cortical lamination, BrdU labeling, white matter, embryonic brain development, mouse embryo
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Movement, Cerebral Cortex, Embryo, Mammalian, Female, Neurons, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review