Cited by 197Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dissociable roles of the posterior parietal and the prefrontal cortex in manipulation and monitoring processes

Open access
Champod, Anne Sophie, Petrides, Michael·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Numerous functional neuroimaging studies reported increased activity in the middorsolateral prefrontal cortex (MDLFC) and the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) during the performance of working memory tasks. However, the role of the PPC in working memory is not understood and, although there is strong evidence that the MDLFC is involved in the monitoring of information in working memory, it is also often stated that it is involved in the manipulation of such information. This event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study compared brain activity during the performance of working memory trials in which either monitoring or manipulation of information was required. The results show that the PPC is centrally involved in manipulation processes, whereas activation of the MDLFC is related to the monitoring of the information that is being manipulated. This study provides dissociation of activation in these two regions and, thus, succeeds in further specifying their relative contribution to working memory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0607101104

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. M Petrides, B Alivisatos, AC Evans Eur J Neurosci 7, 117 (1994).
  2. AL Christensen Luria's Neuropsychological Investigation Manual (Spectrum, New York, 1975).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Champod, A. S., & Petrides, M.
Affiliations
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-09-11
Volume
104
Issue
37
Pages
14837-14842
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2081030913
Cited by
197
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 24
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
working memory, posterior parietal cortex, information manipulation, information monitoring, event-related fMRI
MeSH terms
Adult, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Parietal Lobe, Psychomotor Performance, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review